I'm waiting for someone to legislate that it is now illegal to be female.
Natter 69: Practically names itself.
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
Allyson,
If I could only be certain that you'd be waiting in vain.
Apparently some people think the President killed Breitbart: [link]
The world sometimes astonishes me.
I doubt they'll legislate it illegal to be female, but certainly "illegal to be an unlisenced female not under the control, authority, and responsibility of a (white, Christian) male" would be their wet dream.
Consuela!
OMG. Vince Foster all over again.
Who is the Bush/Clinton clan? I am so confused...
Beverly, I'm pretty sure that's the track they're heading down.
Do you guys think these are the death throes of a class of people who see the world moving on without them? all of this legislation seems especially weird, to me. Desperate.
Do you guys think these are the death throes of a class of people who see the world moving on without them?
That's how it's been feeling to me for a while, but I'm almost afraid to hope/say it out loud in mixed company.
Do you guys think these are the death throes of a class of people who see the world moving on without them?
That's Jonathan Chait's theory--he had a long piece in NYMag about it the other day. That the white Christian male head of household is a shrinking minority, losing both his social and economic dominance over the country, and these last few years have been a desperate attempt to hold back the tide of urban multi-ethnic progressivism.