Beverly, I'm pretty sure that's the track they're heading down.
'Safe'
Natter 69: Practically names itself.
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
Do you guys think these are the death throes of a class of people who see the world moving on without them? all of this legislation seems especially weird, to me. Desperate.
Do you guys think these are the death throes of a class of people who see the world moving on without them?
That's how it's been feeling to me for a while, but I'm almost afraid to hope/say it out loud in mixed company.
Do you guys think these are the death throes of a class of people who see the world moving on without them?
That's Jonathan Chait's theory--he had a long piece in NYMag about it the other day. That the white Christian male head of household is a shrinking minority, losing both his social and economic dominance over the country, and these last few years have been a desperate attempt to hold back the tide of urban multi-ethnic progressivism.
Allyson, I do. I see it as people who are terrified of the world they see coming and are taking desperate measures to protect the world as they think it should be. Which I could respect if I didn't think they were dangerous and crazy. I'm just hoping that their worldview actually dies out and doesn't get passed on to further generations in power.
Congratulations, Juliana and M!
And, of course, the world that they want to protect never really existed. Things were not, in fact, better in 1890, or in 1950. Or they were only better for rich white males -- and even they were unprotected from disease and contaminated air and water.
they were unprotected from disease and contaminated air and water.
Though back then there were more money-achievable enclaves that were less prone to disease and contamination. Their greed has even endangered their refuges, though, but they don't see it.
Or they have a secret moon base they'll all be leaving for soon.
And, of course, the world that they want to protect never really existed.
Nope. They don't actually want the Eisenhower era*. What they want is the leave-it-to-beaverized version where the 50s weren't full of massive migrations, racial tension, fear of the bomb, and the rest.
* on seeing the in-laws' church for the first time, I asked the then-bf "they're kinda the Amish, aren't they?" It's not that they think it's 1953, but they're quite content to live without anything that happened since.
Congrats Juliana and M!
On the Breitbart front, I have no comment, but I do have a plot bunny. What if God had finally decided enough is enough with Christians sullying His good name and the plague he sent to the US became heart disease that struck everyone who didn't have some sort on their car?Crap, I’d better hope the flyers from the New Age-y granola resort in my back seat are visible from