Wait, so my wearing makeup means that I'm a weak tool of the man? Can't I wear lipstick and look a man in the eye and demand he treat me as an equal? Why is this an either/or proposition?
Natter 69: Practically names itself.
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
Can't I wear lipstick and look a man in the eye and demand he treat me as an equal? Why is this an either/or proposition?
Buffy generally did both.
I agree. Even though I don't wear much makeup.
Buffy generally did both.
So did Wonder Woman. While wearing star spangled boy shorts.
My back goes straight up about this. The assumption that I'm wearing makeup, dyeing my hair purple or wearing a skirt for anyone but me makes me nuts. My personal aesthetic is not about you.
I called Think Geek. It sound like the order will go out today. If I don't get an email today telling me it's shipped, I am to call them back. If the order goes out tomorrow that's still OK, so it looks like things are good.
You are an individual, not a social statement.
But I, an individual, can participate in a social statement.
You can. My issue is still with the idea that cosmetics, which are heavily culturally baggage-laden, can be used as a statement of women's "power."
The assumption that I'm wearing makeup, dyeing my hair purple or wearing a skirt for anyone but me makes me nuts.
The assumption that appearance, and the items/tools which are marketed to women to "enhance" our appearance, exist in a cultural and societal vacuum free of any implications, makes me nuts.
IO9 is reporting on a Mozambique breast self exam ad campaign that uses DC and Marvel superheroines doing their own exams. I wish people weren't treating it as sexual. Including the blog IO9 got the story from (IO9 themselves, aren't, particularly).
My issue is still with the idea that cosmetics, which are heavily culturally baggage-laden, can be used as a statement of women's "power."
I don't think that cosmetics (or anything that's used to enhance female attractiveness) are inherently contaminated. And I'll keep resisting that with quite some effort.
While wearing star spangled boy shorts.
Those are not boy shorts. Those are proper knickers.
I don't think that cosmetics (or anything that's used to enhance female attractiveness) are inherently contaminated.
Why? And that's not a pugilistic "why?" -- I genuinely would like to know why you think that.
I'm with Steph on this. I think it's great that lots of women love wearing makeup, and obviously I think one can wear makeup and still demand equal treatment and respect, but the idea of linking the wearing of lipstick to an international show of solidarity for women kinda skeeves me.