J.J. Abrams shouldn't have been allowed near the Star Trek franchise
I don't think Abrams could do a coherent version of Make Way for Ducklings.
Time to slay. Vampires of the world beware!
Buffybot ,'Dirty Girls'
Buffista Movies 7: Brides for 7 Samurai
A place to talk about movies--old and new, good and bad, high art and high cheese. It's the place to place your kittens on the award winners, gossip about upcoming fims and discuss DVD releases and extras. Spoiler policy: White font all plot-related discussion until a movie's been in wide release two weeks, and keep the major HSQ in white font until two weeks after the video/DVD release.
Tom Scola - May 26, 2013 10:51:45 am PDT #24559 of 30000
Remember that the frontier of the Rebellion is everywhere. And even the smallest act of insurrection pushes our lines forward.
Gris - May 26, 2013 11:31:14 am PDT #24560 of 30000
Hey. New board.
Wow, I really missed the disliking-STiD boat, huh? I still thought it was a lot of fun. I doubt I'll buy it like I did the first one, but I'd watch it again on Netflix streaming for sure.
le nubian - May 26, 2013 11:39:38 am PDT #24561 of 30000
"And to be clear, I am the hell. And the high water."
I will rewatch it too! I will stop when the torpedoes go off in Khan's newly acquired ship. And maybe FF until the final 5 minutes. The End!
Dana - May 26, 2013 11:49:11 am PDT #24562 of 30000
I'm terrifically busy with my ennui.
I thought it was fun too. Stupid, but fun.
§ ita § - May 26, 2013 11:53:18 am PDT #24563 of 30000
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
I read a complaint that old!Kirk respected women, with a not-so-between-the-lines implication that nuKirk did not.
I'm trying to imagine Shatner's Kirk evincing any particular respect for women, or Pine's Kirk being a sexist ass that's new to the franchise (for some reason my brain keeps replacing Shatner's communicator with an ERA Now! button), and I'm not sure what in particular they're referring to.
Consuela - May 26, 2013 12:02:52 pm PDT #24564 of 30000
We are Buffistas. This isn't our first apocalypse. -- Pix
My take on Shatner!Kirk is that he's not particularly bad for the time when it was made. It was expected that a single male lead/hero would have an assortment of brief attachments during the run of the show. And only one was something I'd call love (Edith Keeler). He's not obnoxious to the women on his crew, and I can't imagine him stealing a look at someone changing her clothes after she's asked him not to.
Pine!Kirk is more, well, obnoxious, I think. He hits on Uhuru pretty relentlessly, and comes across as more of a jackass generally, even if he doesn't necessarily sleep around any more than Shatner!Kirk did.
That's my take, anyway. If ST is supposed to convey an egalitarian future, in comparison to the present day, Pine is failing rather more than Shatner did.
Jesse - May 26, 2013 12:04:31 pm PDT #24565 of 30000
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.
In the new timeline, we're only just approaching the timing of TOS, right? I hope Pine!Kirk gets less jackassish as they go, assuming they're going to keep going.
Scrappy - May 26, 2013 12:05:35 pm PDT #24566 of 30000
Life moves pretty fast. You don't stop and look around once in a while, you could miss it.
Count me in on the liked it train.
sj - May 26, 2013 12:16:28 pm PDT #24567 of 30000
"There are few hours in life more agreeable than the hour dedicated to the ceremony known as afternoon tea."
I really liked it too.
Dana - May 26, 2013 12:25:12 pm PDT #24568 of 30000
I'm terrifically busy with my ennui.
This Kirk is much younger, though. I think (or fanwank) that a lot of the more irritating personality traits, or traits that seem less connected to the original series, come from that.