In the new timeline, we're only just approaching the timing of TOS, right? I hope Pine!Kirk gets less jackassish as they go, assuming they're going to keep going.
Buffista Movies 7: Brides for 7 Samurai
A place to talk about movies--old and new, good and bad, high art and high cheese. It's the place to place your kittens on the award winners, gossip about upcoming fims and discuss DVD releases and extras. Spoiler policy: White font all plot-related discussion until a movie's been in wide release two weeks, and keep the major HSQ in white font until two weeks after the video/DVD release.
Count me in on the liked it train.
I really liked it too.
This Kirk is much younger, though. I think (or fanwank) that a lot of the more irritating personality traits, or traits that seem less connected to the original series, come from that.
He hit on Uhura pretty relentlessly until he relented--it took her being taken to shut him up which is not how you're supposed to act, but there were pretty much no women who weren't potential (and then realised) partners for Shatner!Kirk.
I don't see how there's any difficulty with drawing a line from this Kirk to the one we watched in TOS--it doesn't take much more than time and growing up since I don't see that he's starting from way behind.
I like TOS Star Trek, but I never liked Kirk. I found him really obnoxious, smug, and irritating. It also wasn't a stellar (ho ho) example of deft storytelling or character development or, god forbid, worldbuilding. Those things were refined from the Next Generation onwards. And not always achieved either.
I thought ST:ID was fun, in the dumb, things blowing up, those people are all very decorative way. But I also understand why Trek fans are angry about it, and I feel the writing was lazy.
Just got back from a matinee of Fast 6, and I think I enjoyed it more than the Iron Man movie this summer. Despite all the Peter pan-style action by various people and vehicles, the only thing that really broke my suspension of disbelief was Shaw and his men being released on the Rock's say-so after attacking military targets and turning God knows how many Spanish civillians into road pizza with a stolen tank.
If ST is supposed to convey an egalitarian future, in comparison to the present day, Pine is failing rather more than Shatner did.
This entire sentence, honestly, is exactly what JJ doesn't get about Trek.
Trek is supposed to be the future done with hope. Not just witch explosions and sex.
I think JJ is completely unconcerned with the idealism that pervaded TOS, and even washed over onto TNG a great deal.
But just because DS9 wasn't all happy shiny through and through (with the Federation also vulnerable to 21st century human frailties) doesn't mean the culture wasn't operating from a different base set of assumptions.
JJ's biggest miss, IMO, is that although there are shiny pretty things that make the future look like a fun place to live, there's no hint of the utopia that Gene was fervently attached to. Most of the complaints I see about how he's fucked up leave me mildly bewildered, but this idealism is the important thing I think they miss. You can lay action and intrigue on top of it, although I think most of the ST movies are actually pretty uninteresting, with DS9 as a guide to one approach.
I don't think he's trashing a noble movie heritage because I think there have only been a couple that are good good, but he is missing the point of the entire franchise.