He would be a culturally conservative pick, having written a whole book lambasting feminism and, according to reviewer Luke Timothy Johnson, associating homosexuality with “nihilism and narcissism.”
I initially read this as "He would be a culturally conservative prick" and now, having read the rest, I'm not inclined to think I was wrong.
no.
is it me, or do they pick the same guy over and over more than Emmy voters?
Maybe we could do a crossover and have Pope Kelsey Grammer?
I still haven't filled out my Papal Madness brackets.
feminism is responsible for homosexuality, because the more women act like men, the more men are likely to want to have sex with other men.
... that's insane troll logic.
So Dad called me at 10:30 last night, and said that he can't move Mom without assistance anymore. Which I knew, having seen them on Sunday, but apparently she'd gotten worse just in the last 24 hours.
Happily, I had already been talking to the facility staff to plan what we need to do. And Dad has a button to push to get help when he needs it, while we figure that out.
But I was up all night anyway, laying awake and periodically listening to an audiobook on theology, which usually does a great job of knocking me out. Not last night, though. Argh.
feminism is responsible for homosexuality, because the more women act like men, the more men are likely to want to have sex with other men.
Doesn't anyone think about the lesbians?
Doesn't anyone think about the lesbians?
The Bible doesn't mention lesbians. Besides, lesbians are just trying to be men, which is wrong but understandable, as men are better than women. But gay men want to be women, which just... calls the whole stupid thing into question.
I just think "Comic Sans was never meant to by a typeface, I was just so horrified that KIDS might be reading TIMES NEW ROMAN!!!!" is a stupid fucking thing to say.
But that's not what he said. I mean, I agree with him that TNR looks APPALLING in a thought bubble. Not because kids shouldn't be reading in Times New Roman, but because Times New Roman does not belong in that context.
feminism is responsible for homosexuality, because the more women act like men, the more men are likely to want to have sex with other men.
So... if more men dress up like women, will that make more women want to have sex with women?
I read the piece about the papal candidate out loud and my (very young) boss asked in confusion, "I thought the church was trying to be more progressive?" Uh, no.
So... if more men dress up like women, will that make more women want to have sex with women?
My sample of 1 is...inconclusive.