Xander ,'Chosen'
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
Black coffee
After posting I looked at my Message Center to see if any of my subscribed threads might be enhanced with pictures. (I don't subscribe to many) The 2 that popped out were Spoilers and Good Riddance. I can see where pictures are a good part of the narrative in those threads.
I'll let you know tomorrow what I do first in a hotel room! Because right now I forget. Not unpack, that's for sure.
Personally, I don't care about the pictures, either.
No comment.
Can someone help me understand how an image thread will affect people having voices, in that thread or any other? I'd like to be able to see all sides of this idea.
I have nothing to add to the images convo at this time. I'll keep thinking about it.
Y'all, I only have to work at one job today! And I got a good 5 hours of sleep last night, so I feel great. Just wanted to share my good mood.
I don't think anyone is objecting to a separate image thread. What I heard were objections to image-embedding in all of the threads, i.e. answering someone with a lolcat instead of actually writing a remark.
A single, separate image thread might be a good way to test it out, see how much use it gets, and how easy it is to use, without disrupting other threads.
I'm concerned about that too. Though I don't really believe the macro-addicts on the FB feed are Buffistas.
What Amy said. It would likely cause weeping and gnashing of teeth to have images scattered throughout Natter, but a picture revealing super spoiling spoilers in the Spoiler thread or pictures of Secret Santee loot in Good Riddance might be ok. Or maybe it wouldn't be. I think that is what we are trying to find out.