Yeah. He's my hero.

Mal ,'The Train Job'


Natter 69: Practically names itself.  

Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.


amyth - Nov 18, 2011 4:56:01 am PST #7396 of 30001
And none of us deserving the cruelty or the grace -- Leonard Cohen

Cash, that is unbelievable.

Bear! Aw.


JenP - Nov 18, 2011 5:28:07 am PST #7397 of 30001

Funny thing I realized this morning -- I don't even know where "Namaste, motherfucker," originated or what the story is, but I cannot see the word namaste (I don't hear it often in my world) without appending the word motherfucker. Fortunately I resist the urge to say it out loud, and, as of this morning, to reply with it on someone else's FB feed. pats self on back

I blame b.org.

Also, it's just funny.


Steph L. - Nov 18, 2011 5:32:30 am PST #7398 of 30001
this mess was yours / now your mess is mine

msbelle, I'm sorry I didn't see your post last night. You should be fine switching from Zoloft to Celexa. You might have a few mild side effects, but probably not.

A Twitter feed for Teppy, Papyrus Watch

That is EXCELLENT. t bookmarks

Men cannot be friends with women they are attracted to

So this means that I can't be friends with any of the Buffistas I've ever met? Cause y'all are foamy.

I realize my confusion is partly because I'm the representative from Planet Demisexual, but -- isn't there a difference between being attracted TO someone, and thinking that they are attractive? I generally assume being attracted TO someone is, basically, wanting to have sex with them, whereas finding them attractive is, well, finding them pleasing to look at.

I think a lot of people are attractive, but don't want to sex them up, which I would call *not* being attracted TO them.

But, like I said, I know my perspective is skewed, and I literally have no idea if other people walk around wanting to sex up dozens of people, or what. No clue.


Karl - Nov 18, 2011 5:55:26 am PST #7399 of 30001
I adore all you motherfuckers so much -- PMM.

I think there's a continuum there, Tep. For my own case, being attracted to someone means I seek out ways to spend time with them, engage with them in some sort of friendly way, and express my affection for them. How that affection is expressed will vary widely from person to person, according to what feels comfortable for them and for me. (And occasionally, I'm not so good at reading what is comfortable and what is not. Sorry about that.)

For other people, it's more directly sexually focused. But for me, it has more to do with affection and re-assurance, the sense of being there for one another. Solidarity.

As a side note, especially when I was younger, I had tremendous difficulty projecting attraction/enthusiasm for someone without having that someone think that I wanted to 'sex them up' immediately. I think the culture definitely encourages us to think exclusively in sexual terms when it comes to crushes, attraction, etc. And I think that is quite often harmful to people of a demi- or asexual bent, as well as twisting some otherwise valuable, mutually-supportive friendships into "you can't be friends with someone you're attracted to."

Does this make any sense at all?


Jesse - Nov 18, 2011 5:58:23 am PST #7400 of 30001
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.

isn't there a difference between being attracted TO someone, and thinking that they are attractive?

Sure, absolutely.


Steph L. - Nov 18, 2011 6:01:59 am PST #7401 of 30001
this mess was yours / now your mess is mine

Karl, I get what you're saying, but I can't tell from your post if you think there's a distinction between "attracted TO" and "finds attractive." You don't *have* to find a distinction; like I said, I'm very aware that my perspective is not the prevailing one. Maybe there is no distinction for most people -- that's what I was asking.


Amy - Nov 18, 2011 6:03:53 am PST #7402 of 30001
Because books.

I'm friends with plenty of people I find attractive, as in I appreciate that they're nice to look at. Both men and women. I do not want to jump into bed with them.

Usually the people I would like to jump into bed with are also people I find attractive, but it's not always about how good-looking he or she is. It's about who they are, how they make me laugh, how their minds work, etc.


Karl - Nov 18, 2011 6:05:57 am PST #7403 of 30001
I adore all you motherfuckers so much -- PMM.

Hrm. I think of 'finding attractive' as a sort of abstract thing, like looking at celebrities or other images where I don't have a lot of personal context.

And I think of 'being attracted to' as someone I'd actually like to spend time with.

So yes, I'd say there's a pretty strong distinction for me.


Steph L. - Nov 18, 2011 6:11:34 am PST #7404 of 30001
this mess was yours / now your mess is mine

Hrm. I think of 'finding attractive' as a sort of abstract thing, like looking at celebrities or other images where I don't have a lot of personal context.

And I think of 'being attracted to' as someone I'd actually like to spend time with.

Interesting. There are a lot (well, okay, a handful) of people I like to spend time with -- other than Tim -- but I'm not attracted to them.

Perhaps we're just using different definitions.


Jessica - Nov 18, 2011 6:13:34 am PST #7405 of 30001
And then Ortus came and said "It's Ortin' time" and they all Orted off into the sunset

I would say yes, there is a distinction. I think it's safe to say that everyone I'm friends with has something I find attractive (not limited to the purely physical), otherwise who would we be friends? There's a much shorter list of friends I'm attracted to, in the if-we-were-both-single-and-available-hell-yes sense.