(((MFNLaw)))
Natter 69: Practically names itself.
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
I love when JZ gets all Catholic.
me too. it is sexier than The Thorn Birds.
Hee!
Aww, thanks folks. In general, Scalzi's blog is a haven of sensibility--at least he does moderate his comments, but it's not precisely a progressive place.
And I do loathe the whole shell-game that goes on with the anti-marriage equality crowd. If a court requires it, it's "judicial activism"; if a legislature passes it, it's "against the will of the people", despite the fact that we live in a representative democracy. And (generally) the same folks who rant about judicial activists overriding the will of the people are perfectly happy with the Supreme Court striking down gun-control laws...
JZ's church is definitely of the awesome, as well as sexy.
sexier than The Thorn Birds.
Uhhh... thanks? (I must here confess to a totally irrational hatred for Richard Chamberlain.)
Hating Richard Chamberlain is totally rational.
He's been great on "leverage", but that's all I got.
And (generally) the same folks who rant about judicial activists overriding the will of the people are perfectly happy with the Supreme Court striking down gun-control laws...
Or deciding the next President of the United States (Gore v. Bush, 2000).
It isn't activism unless you're against the core proposition. If you're for it, then it's reasoned judicial interpretation.
edited for context