I feel suspiciously human. I expect it to wear off right around the time of my three-hour rehearsal tonight.
Natter 69: Practically names itself.
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
I had office hours, then gave exams, then graded exams. Now I'm exhausted and achy. I want a cookie.
I'm okay with my profession not having a naked calendar, because it would be too close to imagining my co-workers naked. However, while I was a krav instructor I tried really hard to convince the guys to do a calendar (as naked as it takes), but never got traction.
It actually takes very little to get field archaeologists naked. Especially if they're British, I suspect. In fact, on multiple occasions while working in field archaeology I was inadvertantly flashed by coworkers who didn't wear underpants.
I've heard some very interesting stories about British archaeologists.
Horrible's kind of the point.
Whose point?
I have spent way too long today defending porn. I don't know why I even bother sometimes. It's not like I like all porn, or anything. I just think it's stupid to say that if it looks like porn but doesn't degrade women it's erotica. That's so...
Step away. Just, step away.
Romney's. The party's. It's a dog- whistle. "We"re not saying only white people are real Americans, but we all know what we mean."
Did they look it up and say "ooh, kkk, let's use that"? Probably not. But the slogan appeals to them for much the same reasons.
But the slogan appeals to them for much the same reasons.
Exactly. It's just gross.
I guess my point was it shouldn't even take a google to think, "Yeah, that's a crappy thing to hitch your wagon to," even without knowing the history of it. For some reason I thought you didn't think I got that, which concerned me.
What's horrifying is that Romney's campaign runners presumably think that has a wide appeal and will be beneficial to their cause. What's more horrifying is that maybe it does for more people than I'd like to think. Well, definitely that, because I'd like to think it would appeal to no one but rather repulse them.
ETA: I think I'm having an issue because it doesn't seem at all subtle or nudge-nudge, wink-wink to me -- it seems very direct in its anti-everyone who isn't like "us"-ism. So, I'm shocked at that level of directness about something so awful (to me, clearly not their target audience). Or that political advisors, no matter what they actually think, would think using that slogan was a good idea. As in, what percentage of this country agrees? Are they right? Because if so, I'm... lots of negative adjectives.