I totally did not have the patience to click all of the links. And I have never watched True Blood, so I have no idea who that it. And there is a person by that name in the show Buffy was on, so that is just super-confusing.
'Lineage'
Natter 68: Bork Bork Bork
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
Totally.
And I virtually never click links while I'm reading an article. At best I'll open them in other tabs to come back to. So while I hate to pile on a site I really like, a piece that depends on people going away to read the embedded links and coming back to finish the paragraph hits a lot of my hot buttons.
Consuela, over in Bitches, I talked about my moron stepbrother and that drug-test thing. It would suck if I didn't have to look at pictures of his ugly kids anymore. I don't know why that is such a big hot-button, but it is. So is libertarian males saying their female friends should be free to be prostitutes. Most other things, I scroll by.
Yeah, it may be considered old school now, but I expect to be able to understand the whole piece by reading just the text on the current page. I'm like brenda -- I may open links later, but not in the middle of the article I'm reading now.
I like the site too! I was just really missing something. I thought for a second they were comparing different ways women could be strong- from Buffy (physical strength) to Tara (from Buffy), who had a very strong emotional backbone.
I may open links later, but not in the middle of the article I'm reading now.
Absolutely. If you can't maintain your message on one screen in your own words, you're doing a poor job. Hypertext should be an enhancement, not a requirement.
Still confused by the nonwhite thing. And I didn't check the comments to see if anyone corrected her fundamental comics error--it's kind of annoying to have someone get on the Batgirl outrage wagon when they clearly are not in the fandom, nor can be bothered to do basic fact-checking.
Yeah, that's super-sloppy. I mean, come on.
There was only one comment there when I opened it. Praising the author, in fact.
Praising the author, in fact
This is the sort of thing that promotes an SJ backlash.
hey ita !, don't think I don't see you retconning your tagline. (Not "tagine," which I typed the first time. Must be lunch time.)