This money, it is too much. You should have some small refund.

Niska ,'War Stories'


Natter 68: Bork Bork Bork  

Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.


Jesse - Aug 10, 2011 5:19:16 am PDT #19977 of 30001
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.

Yikes, Sue. Can you sit until tomorrow and then see if you think you need the doctor? Can you live without going up/down stairs?


DavidS - Aug 10, 2011 5:42:24 am PDT #19978 of 30001
"Look, son, if it's good enough for Shirley Bassey, it's good enough for you."

Awww, Sue. Knees are fragile contraptions. And they don't get more robust as we get older, unfortunately.


Sophia Brooks - Aug 10, 2011 5:56:40 am PDT #19979 of 30001
Cats to become a rabbit should gather immediately now here

Oh no, Sue. I think you should call the doctor. But I probably wouldn't.

Has anyone read this article at Tiger Beat? [link]

I am so confused, because this paragraph is compareing and contracting Buffy and Tara? But it doesn't seem to be the Tara who is on Buffy. And she doesn't reference a Tara earlier? Is it just a typo for Kara Thrace (Starbuck?)

Look at Buffy and Tara. The two characters have a lot in common; they’re physically strong, they’re assertive, they’re sassy. They are also both emotionally vulnerable, are sometimes wounded, may scream and cry and pout and stomp. Buffy enjoys a huge following (with a small minority that calls her ‘whiny’) while people pour on the haterade for Tara on a regular basis. She’s too emotional, too screamy, too…much. Buffy’s a strong female character by many people’s lists, but Tara…isn’t. There’s a reason for that


DavidS - Aug 10, 2011 6:00:33 am PDT #19980 of 30001
"Look, son, if it's good enough for Shirley Bassey, it's good enough for you."

Yeah, that seems weird, Sophia. Tara was never assertive, nor especially physically strong, and not prone to pouting or stomping.

And I thought Starbuck was a very popular character.


Aims - Aug 10, 2011 6:02:25 am PDT #19981 of 30001
Shit's all sorts of different now.

Do they mean Tara from "True Blood", maybe? I've not read the article yet, I'm just guessing.


§ ita § - Aug 10, 2011 6:14:43 am PDT #19982 of 30001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

That author thinks Marvel publishes Batgirl, so who knows? But it's probably True Blood.

What am I missing here?

These calls for strong female characters start to run into trouble with trans women, nonwhite women, and women of colour in pop culture. Because women in all three of these categories are automatically expected to be strong.

When did nonwhite and "of colour" start meaning usefully different things? And trans women are expected to be strong?


SailAweigh - Aug 10, 2011 6:16:01 am PDT #19983 of 30001
Nana korobi, ya oki. (Fall down seven times, stand up eight.) ~Yuzuru Hanyu/Japanese proverb

I think they mean Tara in "True Blood", because the back half of the article is comparing how white women are portrayed as "strong" to how nonwhite or POC women are portrayed and one of the links is to an article about Tara (the oversexed link).


Sue - Aug 10, 2011 6:16:37 am PDT #19984 of 30001
hip deep in pie

I fell back to sleep after posting. i haven't called the dr. Getting there seems impossible. I guess i'll wait until tomorrow. i am totally whiny bc I am supposed to be on vacation. I wonder if I could change this to a sick day.

I think they mean Tara from TB too.


Amy - Aug 10, 2011 6:29:51 am PDT #19985 of 30001
Because books.

That's just crappy writing. Her *thesis statement*, such as it is, introduces three characters, and then she goes on to compare one of them to someone else. Who she never introduces properly. I don't know much about True Blood, so I never would have made the jump without you guys.

Tsk.


brenda m - Aug 10, 2011 6:34:48 am PDT #19986 of 30001
If you're going through hell/keep on going/don't slow down/keep your fear from showing/you might be gone/'fore the devil even knows you're there

By hovering over the links in the prior paragraph I'm guessing she was introduced in one of them, but that's expecting a lot.