Jimmy Olsen jokes're pretty much gonna be lost on you, huh?

Xander ,'The Killer In Me'


Natter 68: Bork Bork Bork  

Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.


Kathy A - Aug 05, 2011 8:25:17 am PDT #19476 of 30001
We're very stretchy. - Connie Neil

Children's picture books that I always get for new parents:

Tuesday by David Weisner

The True Story of the Three Little Pigs by A. Wolf (actually, Jon Sciezka)


Steph L. - Aug 05, 2011 8:39:16 am PDT #19477 of 30001
this mess was yours / now your mess is mine

Neil deGrasse Tyson to host a sequel series to Cosmos. Produced by Seth McFarland, to air on Fox.

So much YAY! and WTF!? in one place.

Seth McFarland? Really?

...is it possible to work rape jokes into astrophysics?

(No, really. I HATE Seth McFarland with the white-hot fury I reserve for things like Magnolia and John Boehner.)


Gudanov - Aug 05, 2011 8:57:46 am PDT #19478 of 30001
Coding and Sleeping

But Olivia Wilde is there as Obligatory Sex/Love Object/Female Distraction, so I'm leery.

Maybe she'll talk to another named female character about something other than men.


Calli - Aug 05, 2011 9:17:32 am PDT #19479 of 30001
I must obey the inscrutable exhortations of my soul—Calvin and Hobbs

Thank you, Kathy.


§ ita § - Aug 05, 2011 9:30:04 am PDT #19480 of 30001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

"What is that female doing there? Get her out of the way and let the guys snark at each other!"

Wow, that's harsh. I don't even like Olivia Wilde and I think she had a perfectly reasonable place in the movie. Regardless of her gender.


Connie Neil - Aug 05, 2011 9:33:35 am PDT #19481 of 30001
brillig

I always admired Schwarzenegger's resistance to having anything sexual happen between his character and the woman in the first "Predator" movie. As I recall, it was something like, "There's something actively hunting them and trying to kill them, this isn't actually the time for sex!"

And I was sorry that "Doom" didn't get better play, because I was very pleased that the girl turned out to be the hero's sister, ie, instant believable interaction/backstory without trying to shoehorn some stupid relationship into it.


Connie Neil - Aug 05, 2011 9:35:23 am PDT #19482 of 30001
brillig

Wow, that's harsh. I don't even like Olivia Wilde and I think she had a perfectly reasonable place in the movie. Regardless of her gender.

I also didn't say it was about her and I haven't seen the movie yet, it was a general statement of my wanting to see guys interacting without what feels like "Oh, we ought to put a chick in this, or women won't watch it."


§ ita § - Aug 05, 2011 9:39:27 am PDT #19483 of 30001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

There are women in stories and life, though. It's hardly weird for it not to be a sausagefest. My point was that even as I was prejudiced to dislike her, she had an integral part in the story and I couldn't be mad at her. You seem to dislike her because she's got tits. She doesn't take away that much screen time from the penises--never fear.


smonster - Aug 05, 2011 9:43:44 am PDT #19484 of 30001
We won’t stop until everyone is gay.

it was a general statement of my wanting to see guys interacting without what feels like "Oh, we ought to put a chick in this, or women won't watch it."

You know what I'd like to see, instead of banning women from films because they're such a distraction?

Maybe she'll talk to another named female character about something other than men.

Ah, Gud beat me to it. How about they write women better? That would be my wish.


Consuela - Aug 05, 2011 9:45:40 am PDT #19485 of 30001
We are Buffistas. This isn't our first apocalypse. -- Pix

it was a general statement of my wanting to see guys interacting without what feels like "Oh, we ought to put a chick in this, or women won't watch it."

Because it's perfectly acceptable for the world not to have women in it?

I can appreciate the homoerotic snark factor without reacting like that. You sound like the guys quoted in the letters columns of 1920s/1930s sci-fi magazines: Oh Noes, no women, they'll taint our manly stories with romance!

As if that's the only function a woman can have in a story.

My reaction to that concept is unprintable and does not meet the civility standards of this board.