At the Upper School, faculty and students staged a counter-protest, wearing rainbows and holding a sign that said, "There is that of God in everyone."

And that is why they are awesome.

I have spent more money at the grocery store in the past week than I did in five years in my last place, I swear to god. But I'm going to make a pot roast tomorrow!

So, Oz just ate several ounces of raw chicken. Should I be worried?

I should have looked sooner when I heard plastic rustling and the groceries weren't put away.

New chicken? I'm sure it's fine -- aren't we supposed to have our cats on raw chicken diets anyway?

I'm reading through the decision in that case about the Jewish school in London that we were talking about yesterday. There's another family who signed onto the suit who have an even more complicated case. The mother converted, in Israel, with an Orthodox rabbi. The parents were married by an Orthodox rabbi. But the father is a Kohen (descendant of Aaron). There are special rules for a Kohen that don't apply to other Jews. One of them is that a Kohen cannot marry a convert. (This is pretty close to the only place in Jewish law that a convert is treated differently than another Jew.) In order for a conversion to be valid, the convert must agree at the time of conversion to abide by Jewish law. (If they change their mind later, they're still Jewish, but they have to go into it sincerely.) After this couple's son was born and they wanted a rabbi to perform a bris, the rabbinical council in the UK ruled that, since the wife was already planning to marry this man when she converted, and she knew that the marriage was not allowed by Jewish law, she therefore went into the conversion already deciding to violate a law, and thus her conversion is invalid. And so, her kids aren't Jewish, either.

This family attends an Orthodox synagogue, and I'm really surprised that they didn't find some way to get this worked out before the kids were applying to secondary schools. But the school said that they wouldn't accept the kid until the rabbis said the kid was Jewish. Also, the mother has been a teacher at this school for years and is head of her department there.

New chicken? I'm sure it's fine -- aren't we supposed to have our cats on raw chicken diets anyway?

Yeah. Fresh from the grocery store. I sat done for a few minutes before I put the groceries away. Time enough for him to dig the chicken out of the bag it was in. He's very food motivated.

I may make him sleep in the basement in case he gets the runs.

Once again, I love the hivemind. CJ's foot is doing MUCH better. Epsom salts are the bestest.

Thanks y'all.

Also, I figured out what was bugging me about the ruling in that case with the school. The issue was coming up because different denominations have different definitions of "Jewish," and the question was whether it's fair for a school that's supposed to serve the entire Jewish community to use the definition from only one denomination, and thus reject kids who other denominations consider Jewish. But the test that they now have to use is not a test that has any basis in any denomination of Judaism. It's essentially based on a Christian conception of religion. A kid could qualify as Jewish under that policy who is not considered Jewish by any denomination. So the school is allowed to give preference to Jewish kids, but the decision about who is Jewish has been taken entirely out of the Jewish community.

Also, the mother has been a teacher at this school for years and is head of her department there.

What? Really? ...I just have a hard time seeing the point of all this, uh, attention to detail. Good thing I'm neither Orthodox nor have any desire to be!

I just have a hard time seeing the point of all this, uh, attention to detail. Good thing I'm neither Orthodox nor have any desire to be!

It's one of the most nit-picky decisions I've ever seen on this sort of question. One of the other families involved in the case is one where the mother converted in Israel and the Israeli rabbinate still recognizes her conversion as valid, but the London rabbis don't.