Emma Watson is in trailers, Gris.
'Safe'
Buffista Movies 7: Brides for 7 Samurai
A place to talk about movies--old and new, good and bad, high art and high cheese. It's the place to place your kittens on the award winners, gossip about upcoming fims and discuss DVD releases and extras. Spoiler policy: White font all plot-related discussion until a movie's been in wide release two weeks, and keep the major HSQ in white font until two weeks after the video/DVD release.
I made the mistake of reading the graphic novel before seeing The Wathchmen, and the pleasure I derived out of the latter was the way the visuals were woven. I thought the genious wasn't in any sort of good or compelling story, but in the deftness in how the information was laid out, and in what increments, and in the actual layouts of the panels. Its been awhile. So, while I was meh on the story of the graphic novel, I was wowed by the delivery. And since the movie didn't adhere to that, the magic of the experience was negated.
Watchmen was a fucking train wreck, but I wasn't bored by it, and I rather enjoyed 300.
points at what Jessica said, nods emphatically
Hell, we own the Blu-Rays of Watchmen and 300, because they're stupid pretty bombast. But even the visuals couldn't save Suckerpunch, and I now know I don't need to think at all about seeing Man of Steel.
I always forget about 300. It was sort of fun, because it was just so stunning, in all senses of the word.
I watch 300 for Fierce Bitch Xerxes. (The eyebrows! Flawless, flawless eyebrows!) I spend the rest of the movie trying to decide if the gorgeous red cloaks are CG enhanced, or just a really good weave of silk.
Don't get me started on Sucker Punch. I will close the thread with my rage and exasperation.
It had a good soundtrack. I will give it that much.
300 looked like a Frank Frazetta painting come to life, so I consider my three admission prices money well spent for the cinematrography alone.
But even the visuals couldn't save Suckerpunch, and I now know I don't need to think at all about seeing Man of Steel.
The latest trailer I saw featured flames burning Henry Cavill's clothes off. Sold.
Jess, is it an okay movie for a precocious 10-year-old?
Jess, is it an okay movie for a precocious 10-year-old?
Oh, definitely. There were some tweens at the screening I saw. The violence level is pretty high, but it's not gory or graphic, just punching and explosions.
Only caveat is it runs 140 minutes, so once you add in 20+ minutes of ads/trailers, you're asking a kid to sit still for nearly 3 hours, which might be tough for some. (However, there's no post-credits tease, so you can shave off ten minutes by leaving as soon as the movie ends.)