Neither does the Necromancer! Either he's being credited for the trilogy, or he did 3 seconds of mocap for that shadow in the doorway.
This has been in debate on Tumblr recently, actually. Err, if the shadow is mocap Cumberbatch, that is.
The Necromancer does make some sort of vocalization thing. I could pull the disc out of my pocket and check (don't ask) to make sure I'm not misremembering, but I'm lazy.
Or Jackson likes instigating games of "Who is that under all that makeup? I saw his name in the credits, he has to be there somewhere."
Or Jackson likes instigating games of "Who is that under all that makeup? I saw his name in the credits, he has to be there somewhere."
For reasons that make perfect sense to me, there are those who claim his outline is recognizable as a CGIed shadow figure.
Which... yeah, okay. It did kind of look like him.
(Due to Frankenstein, large portions of the fandom are quite familiar with the outline.)
After the first time I saw it, I had a very strong memory of the shadow being distinctly Cumberbatch shaped, but subsequent viewings have proven me wrong.
(Not saying it's definitely not him either, but it's a pretty generic blurry human coming out of the smoke.)
After the first time I saw it, I had a very strong memory of the shadow being distinctly Cumberbatch shaped, but subsequent viewings have proven me wrong.
Yeah, it seemed more distinct on first view, but the mind's a suggestible thing and all.
Bwahahahahahaha.
You would know, as I dragged you to it!
And I just have one word for you: callipygian.
callipygian
Suddenly I have questions about a certain nom de web...
And I just have one word for you: callipygian.
I love that word. Not just for what it means, though I have no quarrel with that, either.
I considered picking up the Hobbit dvd at Target today but the special features seem to consist of only the video blogs currently available on youtube.
Nothing like the quality of extras for the Trilogy.