The LOC catalog number would be both shorter and more visually interesting than the ISBN.
Spike's Bitches 44: It's about the rules having changed.
[NAFDA] Spike-centric discussion. Lusty, lewd (only occasionally crude), risqué (and frisqué), bawdy (Oh, lawdy!), flirty ('cuz we're purty), raunchy talk inside. Caveat lector.
The LOC catalog number would be both shorter and more visually interesting than the ISBN.
Oooh, good point.
I will report on Pete's facial expressions when I suggest this idea to him.
I didn't realize you were going to be in LA, Jilli. Promoting a certain book, I presume?
I didn't realize you were going to be in LA, Jilli. Promoting a certain book, I presume?
Yes! June 27th at Book Soup! Let me use more exclamation points!
A swirlybat -style frame containing the ISBN of the book in a nice font.
I like.
The LOC catalog number would be both shorter and more visually interesting than the ISBN.
Okay, how much do I love that 1)Jilli wanted to use the ISBN and 2)Scola immediately countered with LOC
Also, aren't they phasing out ISBNs?
Groovy! Yes, more exclamation points!
!!!
Have achieved NewCat. Currently hiding in the litterbox in the spare room. Leo is back to slounging regally, apparently thinking he drove the interloper away. The next few days should be fun.
aren't they phasing out ISBNs?
Definitely not. In fact, they just recently made them three digits longer.
oh, dear.
Well, recently = 2007. Not even longer since then, if that's what you were thinking of. But as for a phase-out, the book world would plunge into chaos in about 3 minutes without them.