Well, look who just popped open a fresh can of venom.

Xander ,'Empty Places'


Buffista Movies 6: lies and videotape  

A place to talk about movies--old and new, good and bad, high art and high cheese. It's the place to place your kittens on the award winners, gossip about upcoming fims and discuss DVD releases and extras. Spoiler policy: White font all plot-related discussion until a movie's been in wide release two weeks, and keep the major HSQ in white font until two weeks after the video/DVD release.


Gris - Jan 17, 2008 12:22:48 pm PST #3379 of 10000
Hey. New board.

Darn it! Why are no Oscar contenders ever HAPPY?

I think I'm gonna see it anyway. As long as it's not about obnoxious teenagers, I guess I don't mind it being depressing.


erikaj - Jan 17, 2008 12:30:54 pm PST #3380 of 10000
Always Anti-fascist!

Oh, once in a while they are. But it's been a while.


Polter-Cow - Jan 17, 2008 12:33:29 pm PST #3381 of 10000
What else besides ramen can you scoop? YOU CAN SCOOP THIS WORLD FROM DARKNESS!

Little Miss Sunshine was mostly happy.

And so is Juno, mostly.


Gris - Jan 17, 2008 5:25:30 pm PST #3382 of 10000
Hey. New board.

True, but I don't think Juno is a real contender for the best picture.

I was pretty much "eh" on The Savages. Its a dry indie film of the type that is pretty overdone these days. Lots of slightly off-kilter shots of people looking blank or worried or confused, set to extremely low-key acoustic singer/songwriter music and occasional score that's heavy on the whimsy. I didn't really care about any of the characters at all. And the only moment I really enjoyed is entirely attributable to Kurt Weill.

I felt much the same about The Squid and the Whale, but at least it had that awesomely weird kid.


Stephanie - Jan 18, 2008 2:03:23 am PST #3383 of 10000
Trust my rage

I have a question about Juno.

I read a few adoption related blogs and those people all, like every single one, hated the movie and thought it was deceptive and did a real disservice to pregnant teenagers. But everyone everywhere else, here, for example, has seemed to really enjoy the movie - thought is was great, in fact.

ANyway, I'm just curious about how two groups of people could have such a different reaction to the same movie. I'd like to see it but not if I'm going to hate it, you know?


Jesse - Jan 18, 2008 2:39:43 am PST #3384 of 10000
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.

I'm sure it was completely unrealistic about adoption, but I would imagine it was unrealistic in the way that almost anything in a movie was unrealistic.


sj - Jan 18, 2008 3:00:31 am PST #3385 of 10000
"There are few hours in life more agreeable than the hour dedicated to the ceremony known as afternoon tea."

I read a few adoption related blogs and those people all, like every single one, hated the movie and thought it was deceptive and did a real disservice to pregnant teenagers. But everyone everywhere else, here, for example, has seemed to really enjoy the movie - thought is was great, in fact.

That's interesting. My aunt, who adopted two children, absolutely loved the movie. What specifically did they find deceptive?

I'm sure it was completely unrealistic about adoption, but I would imagine it was unrealistic in the way that almost anything in a movie was unrealistic.

I agree with this.


Jesse - Jan 18, 2008 3:02:52 am PST #3386 of 10000
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.

Oh, thank goodness. I was afraid I hadn't made any sense at all! But you know that things in movies are always less boring than things in real life, so I don't really think you can do adoption with a phone call and a handshake (which is essentially how it was portrayed in Juno), but the real life stuff is probably much more tedious to watch.


sj - Jan 18, 2008 3:06:29 am PST #3387 of 10000
"There are few hours in life more agreeable than the hour dedicated to the ceremony known as afternoon tea."

so I don't really think you can do adoption with a phone call and a handshake (which is essentially how it was portrayed in Juno), but the real life stuff is probably much more tedious to watch.

I can handwave all of that away with the presence of the lawyer in the scene, assuming their is more tedious legal stuff that happened off-screen.


Stephanie - Jan 18, 2008 3:10:47 am PST #3388 of 10000
Trust my rage

What specifically did they find deceptive?

One of my favorite blogs, written by a woman who, along with her partner, have domestically adopted 2 little girls, had this to say: [link] Here's the summary:

Though one might say the movie was not "unrealistic" (Juno's lack of legal or other representation, her isolation from others who share her experience, her detachment from grief after placement), neither did the film problematize any of this or suggest any alternate versions of the story.

In the end, the film heartily endorsed the agenda of a return to the bad-old "baby-scoop" days and thus yes, a return the days (if they are indeed over) of women's sexuality being shameful and not within women's own control. And thus yes, a return to the days (if they are indeed over) when abortion was not readily or safely available.

If you knew nothing about adoption going into the film, you'd learn that adoption is sweet and birth mothers have no issues. If you had fairly mainstream knowledge of adoption, you'd leave with nothing new. But if you know about adoption from any part of its the insides, you might well judge, like me, that it does a terrible disservice to the field

I just thought the different reactions were really interesting. Obviously, she has way more invested in adoption than the average viewer, but her description of the movie makes it sound so...I don't know...like Juno just drops off her baby and rides off into the sunset to live happily ever after.

Perhaps I need to wait until I'm not pregnant to be able to enjoy a movie like this.