They don't really make it explicit, but if Juno didn't have any feelings about giving up her baby, the movie would lose an awful lot of its conflict. It would be a really weird movie if it was like Juno was giving up some kind of object that meant nothing to her.
Buffy ,'Same Time, Same Place'
Buffista Movies 6: lies and videotape
A place to talk about movies--old and new, good and bad, high art and high cheese. It's the place to place your kittens on the award winners, gossip about upcoming fims and discuss DVD releases and extras. Spoiler policy: White font all plot-related discussion until a movie's been in wide release two weeks, and keep the major HSQ in white font until two weeks after the video/DVD release.
If Juno wasn't very much invested in her baby's future she wouldn't care so much about the parents she chose for him and their marriage. She loved the idea that her baby would be raised by someone who loved music and horror movies, etc., because she cared about how her child would be raised.
In the end, the film heartily endorsed the agenda of a return to the bad-old "baby-scoop" days and thus yes, a return the days (if they are indeed over) of women's sexuality being shameful and not within women's own control. And thus yes, a return to the days (if they are indeed over) when abortion was not readily or safely available.
I came away from the movie thinking quite a bit about this, but I'm not sure what I would have liked the movie to have done differently in terms of dealing with it.
I just noticed looking at the ad in the Phoenix that CLOVERFIELD was written by Drew Goddard. Huh.
Okay, not that I had any intention of seeing it anyway, but Manohla Dargis's one-sentence review of Cloverfield:
Rarely have I rooted for a monster with such enthusiasm.
Interestingly enough, Willie Waffle gave Cloverfield four waffles. High praise. He thought the monster was very well done. Now, I'm curious to see the movie just to weigh in on the monster factor. From what he said, it sounded more like what you don't see of the moster for the most of the movie is what builds the tension and that he didn't find seeing the whole monster a let down. The local morning DJ asked him if it was a King Kong level of believabilty (I'm thinking the Fay Wray version here) and Willie said no, better.
I should say, that's the only line in Dargis's review that talks about the monster at all, really. She hated it because she wanted to beat all of the characters to death with a shovel.
I just noticed looking at the ad in the Phoenix that CLOVERFIELD was written by Drew Goddard. Huh.
Dude, that's part of why I've been so excited to see it all these months!
I wanna see it, but apparently it has the whole "hand-held-camera-induced nausea" factor. I had to move to the back of the theater for Dancer in the Dark and leave the theater for 5-10 minutes during The Blair Witch Project due to this, so I'm a bit wary....
That's what I heard, Tommy. I couldn't watch the last half of the second Bourne movie (um, Identity? Conspiracy? Supremacy? Cupidity?), so I figure I'll at least have to wait for this to hit DVD, where I can control the nausea in the privacy of my home.