It left a bad taste in my mouth with the premiere. Dare I go back?
Buffy ,'Potential'
Non-Fiction TV: I Reject Your Reality and Substitute My Own
This thread is for non-fiction TV, including but not limited to reality television (So You Think You Can Dance, Top Chef: Masters, Project Runway), documentaries (The History Channel, The Discovery Channel), and sundry (Expedition Africa, Mythbusters), et al. [NAFDA]
Something seemed off about him somehow.
Possibly his hair tumor?
I felt bad for him because he was clearly upset but I am SO glad I don't have to look at that thing for the rest of the season.
Which one was Kelly?
The guy from Baltimore has kind of a shifty reputation here (lots of legal actions) but he also has a ton of very vocal loyal fans. I haven't been to any of his places. His steakhouse has gotten good reviews but not it's not compelling enough to me to have left the neighborhood for it.
I couldn't stand to watch the commercials of Top Arty even I've avoided it so far.
Let me put it this way: After two episodes, if someone came to me and said, you can only have one of these three shows: "Project Runway," "Top Chef" or "Work of Art," I'd choose "Work of Art." In a heartbeat. And I'm still a fan of all three shows.
Perhaps I'm a tad biased -- I appreciate fashion and gourmet cooking, certainly, but I actually know far more about visual art than I do either of the former. But so far, I'd have to see that "WoA" is the best examination of the creative process out of this whole family of shows.
Get. Out. Really?
I was so turned off by the judges' selection in the first episode that I bailed. I just can't take the addition of more shady judging in my life. Maybe I'll try the 2nd ep. My better half's family are mostly artists (and I am decidedly NOT) so the personalities on the show were VERY familiar.
I think it might be a case where, if it's your thing, it's VERY MUCH your thing.
The second episode sheds a little light on just how messed up some of these artists are -- one very prominent case of extreme, debilitating OCD, one admission from an artist that he is literally suffering from brain damage.
What I love about the show is that it's NOT commercial-art or populist-art driven -- although, as I wrote elsewhere, it is VERY much anti-minimalist -- and it does a good job of giving insight into both process and where the drive to create comes from. You may not LIKE everyone competing, but no one is a poseur.
okay, well...on your recommendation, I'll dip back in. I don't really care whether or not I like the contestants, but I really hate shady judging in this type of competition.
See, I don't find the judging shady at all. I quite agreed on the first challenge, and disagreed on the second, although I see why they went for it.
Now I kinda want to watch it! I'll have to tape to watch when Bob is out of town though. He's vehemently anti-anything to do with SJP (post Square Pegs).
okay, why did you agree with the first challenge? I thought the clown dude's art was so atrocious, he should have been forcibly removed from the premises.
I think that he got a pass because he actually painted a face.
They really didn't think that the person eliminated fulfilled the assignment at all.
(And it is not good when what you say about your piece is more interesting than the piece itself.)
Haven't seen episode 2 - going to watch tonight. Hoping Parot is still in it.