Even with normal human strength, you can control how hard you hit someone, etc.
Or so you'd think.
My normal self stopped play punching a LONG time ago. Completely cannot gauge it.
I just don't see how superpowers don't rock my world.
This is where we talk about Buffy the Vampire Slayer! No spoilers though?if you post one by accident, an admin will delete it. This thread is NO LONGER NAFDA. Please don't discuss current Angel events here.
Even with normal human strength, you can control how hard you hit someone, etc.
Or so you'd think.
My normal self stopped play punching a LONG time ago. Completely cannot gauge it.
I just don't see how superpowers don't rock my world.
And I think they can make something really grey and interesting out of it, if someday, Joss decides to continue the story of slayers. I wouldn't mind seeing it on Angel, even.
I'm really hoping Joss will pick this up in the next series of Fray. And it would be nice to see it passingly addressed on Angel. I really don't want Angel to be Buffy Redux. Not even one episode.
What if instead of talking about strength, we were talking about women getting a political voice, another form of power. Some may not have wanted it, some decided it was needed to fight oppression .
Gettting that power was of the good. Some choose not to use it, some use it for good, others don't.
t /poorly drawn analogy on a rainy Sunday with little coffee and real life issues clouding the brain
poorly drawn analogy on a rainy Sunday with little coffee and real life issues clouding the brain
Not so poorly drawn, as that's essentially the metaphor we're playing with here.
What if instead of talking about strength, we were talking about women getting a political voice, another form of power. Some may not have wanted it, some decided it was needed to fight oppression .
Gettting that power was of the good. Some choose not to use it, some use it for good, others don't.
Bless you Heather, and what Victor said.
Also the part where you don't recruit a spy without the spy's consent. It's too intellectually and emotionally demanding a job to be done unconsenting, and anyway, the spy could just embezzle money and flee to Kuala Lumpur.
? This is simply untrue - a spy (as opposed to an agent) is just as likely to be under duress as a willing participant. Read any Le Carre book - I can't think of one Joe who volunteered (I still think the Joe/handler relationship is the best analogy for Watcher/Slayer, and I think I wrote a mini-fic on the subject once.)
In unrelated news, I just this morning realized that Scott Hope is the "hope" in "Faith, Hope, and Trick." Where have I been all these years? t /dopey
Jim, I don't know as how I'd take Le Carre's word for it anyway. I mean, he's in the business of romanticizing secret agentdom, and it's very hard to make a bureaucracy romantic unless you bring in all sorts of artificial angst.
(I did intend spy and agent to mean the same thing, especially as regards a slayer, because she's a doer. Okay, I don't actually understand the difference between the two as regards international skulduggery.)
And usually, requiring someone to do something dangerous and secret without getting their okay first leads to violence and the de-secreting of secrets. Just out of spite, resentment, and ineptitude, aside from the whole "his heart's not in his work" problem.
In unrelated news, I just this morning realized that Scott Hope is the "hope" in "Faith, Hope, and Trick." Where have I been all these years? </dopey>
Mah sistah in dopiness. I watched it on FOX last night, and the same thing occured to be. I'd always gotten the Faith and Trick puns, but...duh.
I'd always gotten the Faith and Trick puns, but...duh.
Ditto and ditto.