y'know ... in regard to the requirement for contraception in health care plans ... I wonder how many of the people who are vehemently arguing that this forces some religious organizations to violate their conscience were just as vehemently supporting the Komen foundation's right to choose how and where to spend their money and defund Planned Parenthood. I mean, if the Komen foundation can choose who qualifies to receive its money, can't the government?
River ,'Safe'
Natter 69: Practically names itself.
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
ita !, I'm glad the lunch was just a lunch.
At karate today, one of the Masters came in to teach us. We went through choke holds and lapel grabs. Good solid self defense. Then I spent a half hour working with my fans. Man - you wouldn't think fans would be rough, but I feel like a total klutz.
Oh, and I gave a guy my phone number. Eeeep.
y'know ... in regard to the requirement for contraception in health care plans ...
About this - I've been seeing all over the place (including from Pierce) the notion that this is about tax breaks. It's not. It's an equal protection question. If you provide health care coverage then that coverage must, under the law, include coverage for contraceptives. Full stop. There is no "if you want to continue receiving federal dollars" clause.
There are some issues regarding the church's (any church's) ability to discriminate or deviate from normal practice where that is at issue. But it's not the case here.
(What IS the case is that this is already settled law in 28 states, so either I missed the mass closures of hospitals and universities across half the country, or they've already learned to live with it somehow or other.)
Timelies all!
Found out a friend of mine fell and busted up her shoulder.(Dislocated and fractured) She may need surgery. 2012 is going on my list now. (There have been other crappy things happening to people I know this year, this is just the last straw.)
And every single one of them was a man. In historic preservation, which at the field level is probably 55% female, and that preponderance of women goes all the way up to the federal regulators in Washington.
Does this group only work to preserve historic buildings with towers or steeples?
Look at this IO9 article: [link]
That story uses the cover art for a Barbara Hambly book. Weird.
Does this group only work to preserve historic buildings with towers or steeples
Heh. Lighthouses, actually.
ETA: Hey, it's Knut!
Have people seen the CNN breaking news? Washington state House of Representatives votes 55 to 43 to approve a bill to legalize same-sex marriage.
Heh. Lighthouses, actually.
Oh, that's even better! No pesky non-phallic structures to bother with...