If I took a glass containing water < = 84, it would start sweating outside right now.
Natter 68: Bork Bork Bork
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
Can you explain dewpoint to me?
The temperature to which the air has to drop for the current humidity to condense from gas to liquid.
Oh dear, msbelle. Good luck with that. I feel you, to a certain extent -- if I hadn't gone to stupid grad school, I'd be so rich. Instead, a large chunk of my take-home goes to student loan payments. Ah well.
Temp at which the moisture in the air will start condensing (as dew.) When relative humidity= 100%, dewpoint= actual temp.
OK, I guess I still don't really care about that. Isn't there usually dew in the mornings? Is that because the dewpoint becomes actual temp at some point overnight a lot of the time? I don't understand nature.
So, the higher the dewpoint temp, the higher the humidity?
I hate finances. health insurance, counseling and mortgage are more than my take home. So I have been not dealing with that reality. Time for austerity measures, for reals.
I am right there with you, msbelle, on all of that.
Yes. And you care because the hotter it is, the closer the dewpoint is to actual temp, the nastier it is for us humans.
Jesse, I think what it means is that if the dewpoint temp is high (like 75 or above), that means it's very very humid: [link]
If I read that right.
Oh sure, I mean, I know I care about the effect, but I think I'll stick with percent humidity. Those things just change in tandem with each other, right?
Steph, more like closer the dewpoint is to actual temp, the higher the humidity. If the dewpoint is 100, but the temp is 250, gonna be a low humidity.
PD does not mean anyone is obligated to provide it to the public. It just means copying it isn't stealing.
Not sure why the other link didn't work for you. This doesn't have the full statement but summarizes the background a bit:
I don't think he's arguing the legality; he's arguing that the law as enforced is unjust, and counter to the public interest when applied to scientific papers.