it sounds to me like the woman should have gone down for negligent homicide at the very least. but I don't know what Florida's rules are.
I'm not sure the jury had that option.
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
it sounds to me like the woman should have gone down for negligent homicide at the very least. but I don't know what Florida's rules are.
I'm not sure the jury had that option.
well, that may explain it!
Hey, is bon bon ever around anymore? I have a question about this: [link]
There wasn't enough hard evidence to convict Anthony--but people have been convicted of murder based on circumstantial evidence before. I still think she did it.
I'm sick thinking of how she'll profit from her notoriety. Ugh.
Always curious about how people get acquitted or convicted. "Innocent until proven guilty" in practice seems to turn into "Guilty until proven innocent" or even "guilty even when there is overwhelming evidence for innocent". But if the defense attorney is pricey enough then "innocent until proven guilty" really does become the standard.
They did have a number of other lesser charges that she wasn't convicted on either, so I have to think the prosecution's case was really seriously weak.
"Innocent until proven guilty" in practice seems to turn into "Guilty until proven innocent" or even "guilty even when there is overwhelming evidence for innocent". But if the defense attorney is pricey enough then "innocent until proven guilty" really does become the standard.
Yes, class and especially race figure into this situation quite significantly.
What Nora said.
OMG, why am I so freaking tired? I have an hour to go. Just one hour.
The jury didn't have an option of negligent homicide. They had 1st and 2nd degree murder, manslaughter, and aggravated child abuse, I think. I only know this because I happened to be walking by one of the TVs in the hallway when the verdict was being announced.