I'm just waiting for some anti-gay-marriage group called OHNOES
You know, with the exception of one deadly and unpredictable midget, this girl is the smallest cargo I've ever had to transport. Yet by far the most troublesome. Does that seem right to you?
Early ,'Objects In Space'
Spike's Bitches 44: It's about the rules having changed.
[NAFDA] Spike-centric discussion. Lusty, lewd (only occasionally crude), risqué (and frisqué), bawdy (Oh, lawdy!), flirty ('cuz we're purty), raunchy talk inside. Caveat lector.
tommyrot - Apr 21, 2009 10:53:29 am PDT #7403 of 30000
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.
DavidS - Apr 21, 2009 10:57:32 am PDT #7404 of 30000
"Look, son, if it's good enough for Shirley Bassey, it's good enough for you."
I'm just waiting for some anti-gay-marriage group called OHNOES
Liberal Unions Liquidate Zygotes
Toddson - Apr 21, 2009 10:59:52 am PDT #7405 of 30000
Friends don't let friends read "Atlas Shrugged"
An interesting editorial from yesterday's Washington Post.
omnis_audis - Apr 21, 2009 11:15:55 am PDT #7406 of 30000
omnis, pursue. That's an order from a shy woman who can use M-16. - Shir
An interesting editorial from yesterday's Washington Post.It's like a strange time-space continuum conundrum. You can't have the choice if the options aren't there, so you can't be congratulated for making a choice if you are advocating no choice at all.
Vortex - Apr 21, 2009 11:17:48 am PDT #7407 of 30000
"Cry havoc and let slip the boobs of war!" -- Miracleman
They really don't get that.
Laga - Apr 21, 2009 11:22:21 am PDT #7408 of 30000
You should know I'm a big deal in the Resistance.
They're society's scrubbing bubbles... we make the choice so you don't have to!
Vortex - Apr 21, 2009 11:25:34 am PDT #7409 of 30000
"Cry havoc and let slip the boobs of war!" -- Miracleman
Huh. Supreme Court Limits Searches of Suspects' Cars When Arrested
Basically, if the police had a reason to arrest someone (suspended license, DWI, etc.), then they could search the car based strictly on the fact that there had been an arrest. Now, the Supremes say that the arresting officer must either have cause to believe that the suspect is trying to destroy evidence, reach for a weapon, or there is a reasonable belief that there is evidence related to the crime at hand.
Whoa! Wouldn't have expected this court to go that way, much less for Scalia and Thomas to agree. (well,Scalia really, since Thomas just does what Scalia does).
Also, Law and Order is going to have to come up with other ways for the cops to search cars when the judge won't give them a warrant.
Nora Deirdre - Apr 21, 2009 11:30:01 am PDT #7410 of 30000
I’m responsible for my own happiness? I can’t even be responsible for my own breakfast! (Bojack Horseman)
Also, Law and Order is going to have to come up with other ways for the cops to search cars when the judge won't give them a warrant.
Seriously, I see Dick Wolf venting his spleen about this decision in an upcoming episode. Probably next week's.
Laga - Apr 21, 2009 11:34:21 am PDT #7411 of 30000
You should know I'm a big deal in the Resistance.
Part of me wonders what Scalia and Thomas are keeping in their cars.
omnis_audis - Apr 21, 2009 11:35:37 am PDT #7412 of 30000
omnis, pursue. That's an order from a shy woman who can use M-16. - Shir
they got blow-up dolls so they can cruise the car pool lane solo.