I think I still had in mind what connie, I think, had said, about being in the midst of writing and taking into account whether or not what she was writing would be potentially disturbing.
Regarding that, I've been mulling and don't think it will change what I write. If there has to be blood, blood will flow. I think if there's a situation where I'm doubtful that the milieu make something obvious--if it's a Supernatural story, odds are there's going to be demons and attendant nastiness--I'll go with the whitefont warning. That way someone with a psyche the texture of boiled leather can ignore it and someone else can check to be sure.
So I can see why people would like a little warning if there's something graphic, but I can't imagine expecting an author to outline every single possibility of offensive/triggerish content.
The BSC appears to be warn for the Big Known Ones. There's not really a request for every author to warn for every known trigger.
The BSC appears to be warn for the Big Known Ones. There's not really a request for every author to warn for every known trigger.
That seems pretty reasonable then!
ETA: I've got no dog in this fight (npi) since I don't read fanfic.
And the fact that I'm still on Sudafed and probably am bollocksing everything up.
That behind-the-counter stuff will getcha.
The BSC appears to be warn for the Big Known Ones.
The
Babysitters Club
books are full of rape and abuse now?
I am getting my geek on: the mail haul today included Mary Borsellino's book/zine about Robin. Woot!
The Boy is just shaking his head and proclaiming me adorably geeky.
(I'm getting mocked for being geeky by a man who has an ocsilloscope in his attic, I'd like to point out.)
well, oscilloscopes are supposed to be in the garage
