I'm completely furious about it.
It's infuriating. You deserve to have the happiness that marriage brings. And you deserve to have the contentment of knowing that any other couple around you can have the same happiness.
[NAFDA] Spike-centric discussion. Lusty, lewd (only occasionally crude), risqué (and frisqué), bawdy (Oh, lawdy!), flirty ('cuz we're purty), raunchy talk inside. Caveat lector.
I'm completely furious about it.
It's infuriating. You deserve to have the happiness that marriage brings. And you deserve to have the contentment of knowing that any other couple around you can have the same happiness.
I believe Prop 8 passed because the people who were mildly against it didn't bother to go to the polls once it was pretty well decided that Obama was going to win. The issue wasn't a big initiator for them, so they shrugged and stayed home. The zealots, though, were going to vote regardless of the presidential race.
Having existing gay marriages in place but not having mass marital chaos break out will be a benefit for the next fight. I can think of half a dozen ads based on "There are 18,000 gay married couples in California. When did you start seeing your marriage falling apart because of that? It hasn't?"
The wheels of politics are jagged and slow. But they do turn.
It's gonna happen, people. And, know you've got allies fighting with and for you until it does.
I'm pretty much on the side of marry who you want to marry - it doesn't affect me (unless you are trying to marry the person to whom I am already married and you do not want to take 1/3 of the household chores) or my life, so if everyone is consenting and of age - go to it.
you do not want to take 1/3 of the household chores
I told Hubby he could have another wife if she slept on the couch and did the chores. He said if he ever was in the market for one he'd use that as a criteria.
so if everyone is consenting and of age - go to it.
The "consenting" is important, as this prevents the slippery slope from leading to man/box turtle marriages.
The "consenting" is important, as this prevents the slippery slope from leading to man/box turtle marriages.
Oh sure, that's fine for now, but just wait until Science creates a genetically modified talking box turtle. What then? Won't somebody please think of the half-human-half-box-turtle children???
I think they'd be AWESOME!
Strongly discouraging, sure, and encouraging termination in the case of detectable problems, okay. But legally forbidding it or forcing termination? Sounds dangerous to me.
Yeah. I think it's wrong but if it's illegal for siblings to have kids I assume that's to protect the health of the child. Why not therefore make it illegal to smoke while pregnant? Why not make pre-natal care mandatory?