We killed a homeless man on this bench. Me and Dru. Those were good times. You know, he begged for mercy, and you know, that only made her bite harder.

Spike ,'Sleeper'


Spike's Bitches 38: Well, This Is Just...Neat.  

[NAFDA] Spike-centric discussion. Lusty, lewd (only occasionally crude), risqué (and frisqué), bawdy (Oh, lawdy!), flirty ('cuz we're purty), raunchy talk inside. Caveat lector.


Pix - Nov 05, 2007 6:51:57 pm PST #2775 of 10002
The status is NOT quo.

Well "you" was a lot more common. Hm. Maybe "ye" is more formal? (i.e. "Hear ye, hear ye" as a call to begin a meeting.) Nah, I don't think so. I don't think there's much of a difference in Shakespeare's usage of you/ye, but I could be wrong.

So in other words, I don't know. My ass-talking, let me show you it.


Laga - Nov 05, 2007 6:51:59 pm PST #2776 of 10002
You should know I'm a big deal in the Resistance.

Is there a difference between "you" as a plural and "ye" as a plural?

I'm amused that when I tried to decide this in my head the phrase that popped up was "ye scabrous dogs".


erin_obscure - Nov 05, 2007 6:57:05 pm PST #2777 of 10002
Occasionally I’m callous and strange

Is there a difference between "you" as a plural and "ye" as a plural?

Ye is archaic, but was early modern English second person plural.

The annoying thing about "you" is the potential for confusion between singular and plural. Maybe i just mean the one person i'm looking at, maybe i mean the entire room, maybe i only mean the five people in the room i actually like. Too much potential confusion. Yet another problem with the English language. (That and the letter "c." It is a useless, confusing letter.)


Pix - Nov 05, 2007 7:01:40 pm PST #2778 of 10002
The status is NOT quo.

Ye is archaic, but was early modern English second person plural.
Yes, but so is "you." That's the confusing thing about you/ye--they're both early modern English second person plural.


-t - Nov 05, 2007 7:02:21 pm PST #2779 of 10002
I am a woman of various inclinations and only some of the time are they to burn everything down in frustration

This site: [link] says "ye" was the subject and "you" was the object form of the plural. Which I should be able to parse. You would think. Er, ye would. I implore you. Hm.


Pix - Nov 05, 2007 7:03:40 pm PST #2780 of 10002
The status is NOT quo.

Ah! Cleared up. I never paid much attention to subject/object for second person plural. I shall have to check a couple Shakespeares to see if that plays out.

In meme news, I am really friggin' glad that today is over. It wasn't a bad day, but it was exhausting. I graded a lot as the kidlets took tests today, but then I gave two make-up tests and tutored (and that did not go especially well and I didn't get paid today because her husband wasn't home to write the check @@), and I'm thinking an hour of reading and bed bed bed is called for.


juliana - Nov 05, 2007 7:06:26 pm PST #2781 of 10002
I’d be lying if I didn’t say that I miss them all tonight…

Is there a difference between "you" as a plural and "ye" as a plural?

From Wikipedia: 'Originally "ye" and "thou" were nominative pronouns, while "you" and "thee" were accusative forms,'


Pix - Nov 05, 2007 7:07:21 pm PST #2782 of 10002
The status is NOT quo.

t tacklehugs juliana


-t - Nov 05, 2007 7:09:31 pm PST #2783 of 10002
I am a woman of various inclinations and only some of the time are they to burn everything down in frustration

I didn't get paid today because her husband wasn't home to write the check @@

Oh that's just ridiculous. Come one, people. Don't do that.


-t - Nov 05, 2007 7:11:10 pm PST #2784 of 10002
I am a woman of various inclinations and only some of the time are they to burn everything down in frustration

Funny, I think I learned how to use thou, thee and thy from the bible, but I didn't pick up on you and ye at all.