Doesn't winter seem more like archiving season?

Willow ,'Lessons'


Buffistas Building a Better Board  

Do you have problems, concerns or recommendations about the technical side of the Phoenix? Air them here. Compliments also welcome.

To-do list


§ ita § - Jun 12, 2003 8:18:00 am PDT #4115 of 10000
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

DX, can you give me a yell as you archive more threads? I'm specifically thinking older Bitches, and maybe another Natter. I'd like to have the posts table as slim as reasonably possible.

And when you're done with your magic, if you could mark them archived in the thread maintenance -- I'm trying to streamline the process from my end too, and that'd help.


Betsy HP - Jun 12, 2003 11:30:24 am PDT #4116 of 10000
If I only had a brain...

I just did a Print Screen to prove ti. I went to the Message Center and neither the Bitch thread nor the Natter thread was included in the list.


Elena - Jun 12, 2003 2:53:52 pm PDT #4117 of 10000
Thanks for all the fish.

I mentioned this on the beta, but when you post something with bad HTML not only does it not post, but when you go to edit it's not there in the edit box either. I understand that bad HTML gets stripped, but so does all the text and it's a pain to have to completely retype instead of just fixing the HTML.


§ ita § - Jun 12, 2003 4:09:11 pm PDT #4118 of 10000
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Elena, fixing bad HTML (as in malformed tags) is akin to mindreading. We have plans in the works to close unclosed tags, but malformed is a different kettle of fish.

Replacing an unrecognised tag with entities <> is certainly possible, but involves maintaining and checking against a complete list of every allowable HTML tag.

Which is processor intensive and will slow the site down.


Jon B. - Jun 12, 2003 4:13:46 pm PDT #4119 of 10000
A turkey in every toilet -- only in America!

I think what Elena would like is for the bad html to be stripped out when it's posted, but then reappear in the edit box if one clicks on "edit." Not sure how we'd do that, short of keeping two copies of every post -- one with the html stripped out, one kept as is. The former one would get posted; the latter would just sit in a table waiting for someone to click on "edit."


§ ita § - Jun 12, 2003 4:16:36 pm PDT #4120 of 10000
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

That would be even more intensive -- either database, by duplicating posts, or stripping it before every display.


Jon B. - Jun 12, 2003 4:20:10 pm PDT #4121 of 10000
A turkey in every toilet -- only in America!

That would be even more intensive

Oh yeah, definitely. But it doesn't require mindreading or a complete list of html tags. I was just clarifying what I think Elena would like.


§ ita § - Jun 12, 2003 4:23:10 pm PDT #4122 of 10000
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

The complete list of allowable HTML tags isn't the biggie. It's the processing that's the issue. But in that scenario, it's once per post, not once per display.


§ ita § - Jun 12, 2003 4:50:30 pm PDT #4123 of 10000
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

My corner of Earthlink world has decided to stop propagating buffistas.org. I'm good with www.buffistas.org, but that's been propagated since before. Mail.buffistas.org is new to me, and won't resolve.

Chat support guy told me it was because mail servers are often firewalled. I HATE support folk that know less than I know.

They should be hit over the head with a TCP/IP book.

But he's finally forwarding a ticket on, and if anything useful comes of it, bitterchick, I'll pass the info on.


Elena - Jun 12, 2003 4:55:35 pm PDT #4124 of 10000
Thanks for all the fish.

Jon is correct in what I want, it's actually what I thought we had, but obviously I am mistaken.

Thing is, I know that the bad HTML was stripped, but now the text within the bad HTML is also gone and I don't remember that happening.

Surely it can't be that I never made formatting errors before. Nah.