Angel ,'Conviction (1)'
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
I like structure, so I give a lot of weight to internal consistency -- if a theory is load bearing, so to speak. However, wrt to the Coders, I'm interested to know which version of the Bible they're parsing, and how they handle issues like that.
It's not that I care that they're wacky -- it's that I suspect they don't have much of a case.
Randomly: Starsky and Hutch looks really gay.
Randomly: Starsky and Hutch looks really gay.
I've never even seen the show, and I can tell you those aren't the really gay moments.
Migraines should just not be allowed.
Once I'm in charge, I'm banning them outright.I'm voting for ita.
Still going to crack the whip on too much perfume -- that's just a wrong thing, whether I'm in a migraine haze or no.Twice.
Bev and More does not have the yummy wine I had on Saturday at dinner. I am b. reft.
Not unsuggestive of a certain ... degree of physical intimacy. Good enough to slash from.
God bless the buddy action genre. It's so damned easy.
eta: I wrote this before I saw that you got what I meant, but I'll keep it.
kat-- I know I'm not being especially clear, but the point I'm trying to make is that even if you have examples from the text, it doesn't mean it's a correct analysis. (I avoid using "valid" because I think that can be misconstrued.)
Take, say, Stephen Greenblatt's theory that Shakespeare was Catholic. (A little easier because it's either true or not.) If I were a professor and I had a student that made the same argument (using just the text), even if I wasn't convinced, I wouldn't try to talk them out of making it. If, however, I had a student that tried to use the text to prove that Shakespeare was a Scientologist, I would try to talk them out of interpreting the text that way. Because it may be supportable, but given the arrow of time, it's not a valid interpretation.
Still going to crack the whip on too much perfume -- that's just a wrong thing, whether I'm in a migraine haze or no.
sacrifices and curries a goat for ita
I've gotten this answer a few times too. But it doesn't really make sense to me. I mean, if it doesn't hurt the car, then it does what it's supposed to do. And what does "run much better" mean, better mileage?
The engine's computer can figure out that it has lower octane gasoline and retard the timing to compensate. Doing so generally means less power and fuel economy. The higher octane gas allows the engine to run more efficiently and meet it's power and mileage ratings. Now if your engine is designed to run on lower octane gas, then using a higher octane will not produce better results. Generally speaking higher compression or turbo/supercharged are the ones that can benefit from higher octane gas.
God bless the buddy action genre.
If I recall correctly, Starsky and Hutch was darned near the beginning of the buddy genre. I remember an article back then talking about how innovative it was to show partners as devoted friends.
