I'm sorry, msbelle.
'Conviction (1)'
Natter 74: Ready or Not
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, butt kicking, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
Lots of hugs to you, Rebecca
I just had a bone scan done. (Base line to see if the next anti-cancer drug they want me to take messes with density).
That was kind of a weird experience.
Cold draft coming off the kitchen. Solution: bake cookies. Chocolate chip and snickerdoodle dough chilling.
Much love coming your way, Rebecca.
I hope you can find a happy to help off set the sad, Rebecca.
Oh my god, I have an author getting seriously shitty with me about a deadline. When we send them their edited manuscript to review, we request that it be returned within 2 days, and put that date in the subject line. [Note: I did not come up with that format; I am a cog in the giant machine that is the AMA.]
When the authors inevitably ignore the deadline, we follow up, and remind them of the date the manuscript was due back.
This author who I followed up with today shot back with "I have reviewed the email that you sent and there is no date mentioned. Do NOT [all caps hers] make unsubstantiated claims while insinuating that I am delinquent."
So I emailed back and said "The return date is in the subject line of the email you received on January 15." The phrase "YOU JACKHOLE" was not included, but heavily implied.
How do they do that, Lee?
This author who I followed up with today shot back with "I have reviewed the email that you sent and there is no date mentioned. Do NOT [all caps hers] make unsubstantiated claims while insinuating that I am delinquent."
OH MY GOD. I love how she's got plenty of time to parse the details of the email, but not enough time to actually do the review or to notice the subject line.
I love how she's got plenty of time to parse the details of the email, but not enough time to actually do the review or to notice the subject line.
She just replied with "I offer the suggestion of also putting it in the email since the subject is so long that it is truncated by Outlook unless I pop the email out, especially if you expect compliance."
Now, I totally grant her point that the subject line can get long because of all the stuff that the template puts in the subject line, so maybe adding it in the body of the email is a good thing, and I'll mention that to the freelance coordinator, who can pass the suggestion up the chain (or shoot it down).
But it's the "especially if you expect compliance" that KILLS me. Should I NOT expect compliance? Is that a crazy wacky thing in publishing?
I would have been 100% fine with her reply if she had left that shitty, bitchy snark off the end. Fuck you, lady. Your article was both boring AND poorly written.