Decimated totally gets me going. Mostly because a) it's right there in the word and b) now I'm short a word. I want a word.
leggings should be worn with flats!
This is news to me. When did that get decided?
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
Decimated totally gets me going. Mostly because a) it's right there in the word and b) now I'm short a word. I want a word.
leggings should be worn with flats!
This is news to me. When did that get decided?
decimate is like anniversary.
I don't use decimate because devastate is always better and of course, it marks me as foolish not to know the historical meaning. But that also means decimate has pretty much been removed from the language. It's too specific and too obscure. Now I'm short a word.
A little part of me dies whenever I hear NPR use 'decimate' incorrectly.
Sore tonight.
I've got so much travel to schedule, it is insane. It's not that I don't like travel. It's that I don't like the anticipation of the disruption to my routine. And really, flying 8+ hours for one day for a wedding just makes my head hurt.
I don't get how you would use the word decimate as "kills 1/10th of"-- I can't think of any way that that would be measurable. Unless you were in an army, counted off by 10s and then killed.
Unless you were in an army, counted off by 10s and then killed.
Which is pretty much the origin of the word, except I think it was the population, yeah? Conquering Romans were not nice people.
It originates with the Roman practice of punishing a unit by dividing it into groups of 10 and executing one person from each.
Really? We should be using it in the sense of the Roman practice? By the time the bubonic plague hit Europe it was being used in the sense of "destroy a large portion of the population."
Oh- OK. That is really too specific to use, so I can totally understand how it means "devastated".
You can still use decimate to mean 1/10th killed. Lots of words have more than one and even contradictory meanings. I kind of wanted someone to bring that up in the "illin" crossword puzzle controversy (aside: I am about a month behind in my NYTimes crosswords and just got to that puzzle recently. That was the first answer I got. Felt like cheating).
To be clear, I don't cringe when I hear "begs the question" because it's wrong. It's more a reminder that my grasp of logical fallacies is shaky, these days, and I find that disturbing.