The only judgement I'm making is that putting bullets in the laptop was wasteful. eta: Well, I also wonder why the arms on that chair are so high, but that's less relevant.
Contrary to common misuse, “moot” doesn’t imply something is superfluous. It means a subject is disputable or open to discussion. e.g., The idea that commercial zoning should be allowed in the residential neighborhood was a moot point for the council.
Common misuse is the only way I've ever heard this word used. Perhaps the meaning has now changed.
Oh, jesus, we're sitting here while someone scans a QR code.
I don't get their problem with moot. Here's the Oxford definition:
adjective
subject to debate, dispute, or uncertainty, and typically not admitting of a final decision: whether the temperature rise was mainly due to the greenhouse effect was a moot point
having no practical significance, typically because the subject is too uncertain to allow a decision: it is moot whether this phrase should be treated as metaphor or not
It's a moo point! It's like a cow's point. It doesn't matter.
At least it's not a mute point.
I do not correct people's spoken English, although when some people say, "I feel nauseous," I think, "You're certainly having that effect on me." I'll probably always change "I feel nauseous" to "I feel nauseated" in written copy.
Oh yeah, totally different thing. My irk is only directed at the verbal correction.
I'm not sure why this swing in the definition of nauseous is supposed to be worse than the original swing. Is 100 years ago still too recent?
With regard to nauseous/nauseated, I don't think I know one person (uh, outside of this board) who uses them correctly.
I have never thought nauseous meant anything but feeling nauseated until today. But I don't use it often, because it's a spelling trap for me.
