Ack, Lee! I have known many cats to freak out on move day and find exciting!new!hiding places. You'll find her, I'm sure.
DITA!! You get out here right now, missy.
Willow ,'Conversations with Dead People'
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
Ack, Lee! I have known many cats to freak out on move day and find exciting!new!hiding places. You'll find her, I'm sure.
DITA!! You get out here right now, missy.
Oh lord, Dita -- I bet she's hiding. But she should COME OUT NOW. DIIIIITAAAAA!!! COME OOOUUUTTTT NOOOOOWWWWW!!!
(I hope she heard me...)
Dita, come back!
Oh no! Based on the cats Ive known, I would guess hiding as well, but please Dita, come out now!
I just checked my snail mail and I got Jehovah Witness'ed by mail. Hand addressed envelope and hand written note, plus Watchtower.
Dita....come out, come out. Your owner needs you.
Dita!!!!
Before I lose it completely, I just need one more round of "choose the student worker"
Candidate A
Second Semester Senior
Experience Organizing Large events
Can't start for a week
Likes animals
Completely well spoken on phone and in person (no awkward pauses, etc)
Because she is a senior, I will only have her for 3 months
Candidate B
Sophomore
Experience as an office worker/phone answerer
Already works for the School, so could start right away
Because she already works for the school, not available for more hours
Likes theatre
Because she is a sophomore, may not have to hire anyone for 2 years
HELP!
Which is more relevant experience to the position? Which do you feel like you will click with day to day?
I suspect from what you've said earlier that Candidate A is the superior candidate, but your main objection to her is the rehiring process. However, you have no guarantee that Candidate B will stick with you for the two years, so I think you should lessen that as your criteria and gauge the workers on how they will be for you doing the job.
I would have said Candidate B, because three months isn't worth it. Unless Candidate A has actually worked for your office before? Then she'd need less training.
I suspect from what you've said earlier that Candidate A is the superior candidate, but your main objection to her is the rehiring process. However, you have no guarantee that Candidate B will stick with you for the two years, so I think you should lessen that as your criteria and gauge the workers on how they will be for you doing the job.
You are right. The other problem I have is that I am afraid I am screwing over my relationship with the research department by not sharing a student with them-- which I often do in the summer when students can work 40 hours a week.
What makes you think you'd be screwing over your relationship? Had you already committed to doing so?
And hiring either of these students would not solve that, right?