Allyson, marry me.
Natter 69: Practically names itself.
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
I seriously don't get the disconnect between the complete trust in government to provide a militia to protect citizens against catastrophic invasions, but no trust in government to provide scientists to protect citizens against catastrophic illness.
You clearly have not read the Constitution. In it? A militia. Not in it? Science.
I did read it! I remembered the part about the post office a couple of weeks ago!
Then what is your question??? Clearly guns are American and science is probably Communist or something.
Airport traffic...
::yawn::
In news of the silly -- a friend just posted something on Facebook for "Jen P____, Martin A_____, and all my other geeky friends." I was all happy about being a named geeky friend. Like, "Sure, you're all geeks, but these two? Outstanding." I=ridiculous.
Then what is your question???
The question is about trust. There's trust in the government to do this enormous, dangerous thing (run a militia to protect us), but not to run another things like the USDA or FDA.
Not about whether these things are constitutionally required. It's like, "The world is a dangerous place! Poor MOAR MONEY into the military!" Which is then done. Which the government then controls and oversees and all of that. And it's fine.
The world is a dangerous place, poor more money into the CDC isn't really done. I'm more worried about zombies than a chinese invasion, so take it with the grain of salt.
(I actually do know what you're saying.)
It's the holidays. I couldn't find the compose button on my gmail for about 15 minutes this morning. I assume no one knows what anyone else is talking about.
Incidentally, in all my TLDR, I think I came up with good framing for the alta-lobby. "Big Snake Oil"