Lorne: My little prince. Oh…what did they do to you? Angel: Nina…tried to…eat me. Lorne: Oh, you're--medic! You're gonna make it Angel. Just don't stop fighting. Doctor! Is there a Gepetto in the house?

'Smile Time'


Natter 68: Bork Bork Bork  

Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.


beekaytee - Jul 24, 2011 6:43:11 pm PDT #17903 of 30001
Compassionately intolerant

What a beautiful story, Steph.

Yay for awesome neighbors of all stripes. I love my neighbors a lot, but we aren't as sweet with each other.

Guys, I can't recommend pet insurance enough.

Zen, which company do you use?

I bought Trupanion but, while the customer service is nice, the actual coverage isn't proving to be particularly useful.


Aims - Jul 24, 2011 6:44:15 pm PDT #17904 of 30001
Shit's all sorts of different now.

Amy - I still find it highlarious that we both have cats named Switch.


Zenkitty - Jul 24, 2011 7:24:39 pm PDT #17905 of 30001
Every now and then, I think I might actually be a little odd.

bonny, I have PetPlan. They offer different levels of coverage and are pretty comprehensive even at the basic level. I found them because a friend of mine has been with them for many years and many pets and recommended them after Leo's epic vet trip.


DavidS - Jul 24, 2011 7:55:05 pm PDT #17906 of 30001
"Look, son, if it's good enough for Shirley Bassey, it's good enough for you."

Back from another day of baseball in Fremont.

Good Things: Emmett hit a baseball about 290 feet (2 run double). His team won the tournament.

Bad Things: Eh, we won and got a trophy. Nothing's so bad.


lcat - Jul 24, 2011 8:16:13 pm PDT #17907 of 30001
I have loved the stars too fondly to be fearful of the night.

Hec and/or other baseball fans, I have a question for you. I went to a WCL game today (which essentially seems to be a summer league for college players to build skills and get scouted) and there was a call I don't understand. The field was set up so that there was tall (maybe 18 foot?) wooden fence at the outer perimeter and then in left field, a waist-high nylon fence about three feet in from the wooden fence. In the fifth inning, there was one out with a runner on second when the batter hit a long, high ball to left field. The fielder jumped up and caught it but flipped back over the small fence and hit the ground between the two fences. He came up with the ball, though, and then just lobbed it into the shortstop who had come over to relay it back to the infield. In the meantime, the runner on second had advanced to third. After we all cheered for the incredible catch, there was a long conversation between the umpires and the managers which I thought was about whether the hit had been a home run or an out. Apparently, it was decided that it was an out because the batter went to the dugout. What didn't make sense was then the umpire, over the objection of the other manager, waved the runner on third into home, scoring a run. There was lots of discontent from the home crowd but no one that I was near could figure out that call. Any ideas?


DavidS - Jul 24, 2011 8:32:04 pm PDT #17908 of 30001
"Look, son, if it's good enough for Shirley Bassey, it's good enough for you."

There was lots of discontent from the home crowd but no one that I was near could figure out that call. Any ideas?

That's kind of a weird scenario. The general rule is that if you make the catch while going over the fence (or into the crowd on a foul ball) is that it's an out.

What didn't make sense was then the umpire, over the objection of the other manager, waved the runner on third into home, scoring a run.

The umpires are allowed a fair amount of discretion to make the call on weird plays and I think the argument here is that if the fielder had simply made a regular catch on the ball, the runner would have been able to tag up and score because it would've been a very long sacrifice fly. Umpires are allowed to award extra bases to mitigate weird circumstances and that seems to have been their judgment.

For example, if a guy hit a ball into the outfield and it bounced up and may or may not have been a ground rule double but a fan reached over the fence and grabbed the ball, the ump is allowed to predict the most likely outcome in that scenario and award the bases as he thinks it would have happened without the interference.

I presume they made a similar judgment call here.


lcat - Jul 24, 2011 8:45:08 pm PDT #17909 of 30001
I have loved the stars too fondly to be fearful of the night.

It being a judgment call makes sense. I think we were all so stoked about the catch (including the fielder who stood there holding the glove above his head for twenty seconds or so to prove that he had it) that no one paid much attention to rest of the play. We came back and scored again in the next inning on a couple of solid doubles so won despite the run scored by fiat.

Thanks for the explanation; I'm rediscovering my love of minor (or in this case, very minor) league ball and am realizing how much I've forgotten


DavidS - Jul 24, 2011 8:48:11 pm PDT #17910 of 30001
"Look, son, if it's good enough for Shirley Bassey, it's good enough for you."

In a lot of ways the lower levels are way more fun to watch. It's more human scaled and relatable.

The last minor league game I saw was with amych in Durham.


lcat - Jul 24, 2011 9:00:55 pm PDT #17911 of 30001
I have loved the stars too fondly to be fearful of the night.

It really is a great way to see the game - parking's free, ticket is $7, you sit 20 feet from the edge of the field, the play moves quickly, and for one inning, the announcer lets a two year old give the names of the batters. It is just wonderful way to spend a summer evening.


Theodosia - Jul 25, 2011 1:46:15 am PDT #17912 of 30001
'we all walk this earth feeling we are frauds. The trick is to be grateful and hope the caper doesn't end any time soon"

Woke up this morning to news about Hayden's "adventure". Here's hoping for a swift recovery, right?