I'd rate it R and then wonder at my brain because I first saw it as John and Jo . I need a therapist.
Natter 67: Overriding Vetoes
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, nail polish, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
PG-13?
I was going to say PG-13 but it's certainly adult themed while being entirely unporny or gratuitous. Which is, to me, slightly older than all 13 year olds.
I love pregnancy art and think children should be included in that experience, so I suppose I'd agree with the PG-13 rating. It can use an explanation for the younger viewers.
I don't think PG-13 is actually about 13-year-olds at this point, really.
Descriptive versus prescriptive ratings?
I'll put PG-13 and mention what it contains. I figure if Demi Moore et al can make it on the cover of unbagged average magazines it's not that big a deal. I just wonder that the man in the picture might up the rating a bit.
Yeah, it's not more than you see on the beach, skin-wise.
They did bag that Demi cover though! Well many retailers, not across the board. Which, you know, I actually totally did not agree with. It was in no way a pornographic or overly adult image. People are weird.
I think a PG-13 with a mention is fine.
Really I don't understand ratings. Well, I don't understand why so many people think violence and death is just fine and unsexualized nudity is OMG NAUGHTY.
Well, I don't understand why so many people think violence and death is just fine and unsexualized nudity is OMG NAUGHTY.
God, right??