Take off the marshmallows and I'd be all over that "cake". Stuffing, good; mashed potatoes, good; sweet potatoes, good. Heck, substitute cranberry sauce for the marshmallows, yum.

I interrupt the disturbing "cake" talk to ask: When Queen E 2 dies, Camilla Whatherface will not be Queen, right? She'll be a Consort, er, Consortess?

I know it's a constitutional monarchy, so it's pretty irrelevant, anyway, but since Prince Albert and Prince Philip were Princes in their own rights, and didn't become King upon marrying the monarch, it goes the same way for a woman, right?

Queen Consort, I think.

BT, for me it was the titles, and repeating everyone's titles, and clapping people up and down to the stage, and all the letters after everyone's names, etc. Just set me twitching.

That would set my teeth on edge too. I've never come across it, though; I suspect it was club-specific (or at least a cultural thing). Well, except for clapping of course. I applaud speakers anywhere else, I'm not going to be less courteous tosomeone who's trying to learn.

Clubs do vary widely. I attended one club that IMO was barely a speaking club. They met over dinner, and there were a couple of speeches, but the evaluations did nothing to help them improve. It was mostly an excuse to socialise. The club I joined in Philly was more uptight, but still pretty friendly. The club I belonged to at uni was hilarious, and having most of the membership being lecturers gave it an interesting culture. My current club is the most effective I've found at nurturing speakers - it's long established and does very well at attracting new members. It runs youth programs for a couple of local schools, and occasionally does speechcraft courses for the public. The club closest to my home is smaller and more intimate.

they seriously need someone to include moar fun and less Robert's Rules in their website and wikipedia page.

Yeah, my club cut down business sessions to four times a year, because who enjoys that? Although, at my uni club, the business sessions were frequently hilarious; I remember a couple of meetings where the business session was the highlight.

This page agrees with ita, but then uses Queen X, consort of Y down at the bottom of the page: [link]

But she doesn't affect the succession, since she has no royal blood in her family?

(And really, what the HECK does the royal family DO?! A lot of philanthropy and figure-heading symbolism, it seems to me. Is there any actual, real leadership?)

That page also says Camilla will not go higher than Princess Consort, even if Charles takes the throne.

Prince Philip didn't become King upon Liz' ascension because that would sound like he outranked Her Majesty. A Queen is always outranked by a King, so Camilla could become Queen Consort, like Elizabeth the Queen Mother. However, I thought there was some deal re: Charles marrying her, a divorcee, that depended on Camilla agreeing to only be Duchess of Cornwall if/when Charles becomes King. I wonder if the Queen will be as long-lived as her mother. I'd feel a little sorry for Charles if he never got the job he's trained his whole life for, but I doubt he's in any hurry to lose his mother.

It's a constitutional monarchy, Erin. They're mostly decoration, but I think they can have a strong diplomatic presence, which I will never play down. And they can exercise pressure just by opining, although I'm sure that backlashes as often as not.

eta:

Camilla agreeing to only be Duchess of Cornwall if/when Charles becomes King

Princess Consort.

in reality, all too often feedback was like "OMG, he didn't die giving that speech! 100%!!"

Is the subtext "Despite my best efforts"?

I know it's a constitutional monarchy, so it's pretty irrelevant, anyway, but since Prince Albert and Prince Philip were Princes in their own rights, and didn't become King upon marrying the monarch, it goes the same way for a woman, right?

According to Wikipedia, she will legally be Queen, but won't take the title. She'll be referred to as the Princess Consort.