Corn muffins.

The corn bread muffins win.

It's black bean chilli.

Corn muffins.

Big surprise, you going with the muffins.

I just found out that Pink does a cover of I Touch Myself. It's quite smoking. But my craving was for The Divinyls, so that's where my ninety nine cents went.

Big surprise, you going with the muffins.

I know, right.

Corn bread will work too!

My parent attending church doesn't affect my ethnicity.

His mother converting in an Orthodox ceremony or a Masorti ceremony doesn't affect his ethnicity. But that is what affected the decision.

If the court went with the decision that a kid considered Jewish by any mainstream denomination would be considered Jewish, then any kid raised in a Jewish household from the age of 7 or younger would be considered Jewish, since that's the definition the Liberal movement uses.

The school is claiming someone is not Jewish (implicitly for ethnic reasons) and then discriminating against them. That is ethnic discrimination whether the judgement is right or wrong. If the Duch Orthodox church decide a white person was Black and refused to admit them for that reason, the wrongful identification of ethinicity would not keep it from being discrimination. If you are excluding people based on a definition of religious identity base on what their parents did before their birth, that is ethnic discrimination under UK law. What ethnicity you actually are is a separate issue.

If you are excluding people based on a definition of religious identity base on what their parents did before their birth, that is ethnic discrimination under UK law.

But then why is it OK to exclude people based on a definition of religious identity based on what their parents did after their birth?

I'm taking a poll. If you were getting a meal of chilli, would you prefer corn muffins or crackers with the chilli?

Always the crackers, you freaks! (Not just on Cincinnati chili; on Texas chili, too.)

Corn muffins. Sheesh.

(I like corn muffins, but with apple butter on them. Nom.)

Here's where my main issue with the ruling is:

Applying this reasoning to the present case, it appears to us clear (a) that Jews constitute a racial group defined principally by ethnic origin and additionally by conversion, and (b) that to discriminate against a person on the ground that he or someone else either is or is not Jewish is therefore to discriminate against him on racial grounds.

So a Jewish school is allowed to give preference to Jewish students, but is not allowed to give preference to Jewish students? There was a girl in my middle school who was Catholic, but came to synagogue a lot because some of her friends were Jewish and she wanted to hang out with them. (There was also a Jewish girl who frequently went to the Catholic church for the same reason, but she's kind of irrelevant to this.) This girl was still Catholic. If she had this level of synagogue attendance and also volunteered as a camp counselor at the JCC (or whatever the British equivalent is), she might qualify as Jewish under the new rules. She had no intent of converting, but I can easily see her wanting to go to this school because that's where her friends were going, and her parents probably would have said OK. (This school is considered VERY good academically.) So if the rule is that Jewish kids get preference, because they want to give Jewish kids the first chance at Jewish education, what is the reasoning for giving her preference?