I have told my friends that looking at Adrian Grenier was one of the first time I understood those idiots that shout stuff at women on the street. And I find myself wondering if you could(or should) describe a male actor as an "ingenue" ever.(Michael Cera, anyone? Though I don't really *want* him, it might fit him better than Grenier.) So I suppose "VincentChaseInIceCreamTopping" could be a Sociological Image, too.
'Hell Bound'
Buffista Movies 7: Brides for 7 Samurai
A place to talk about movies--old and new, good and bad, high art and high cheese. It's the place to place your kittens on the award winners, gossip about upcoming fims and discuss DVD releases and extras. Spoiler policy: White font all plot-related discussion until a movie's been in wide release two weeks, and keep the major HSQ in white font until two weeks after the video/DVD release.
Bewitched can easily be read as the tensions of being gay and passing as straight in a repressive American culture.
I say this with all love--some people have too much time on their hands.
This sounds like we're back to the reason for Moff's law. It's not even an unusual interpretation of the show known as the "gayest show ever."
Well, I hadn't thought of it, pre- Buffista(like so many things) But it makes sense. Also, the one I got to first, about women hiding who they are/ our power. And now I totally want to write Bewitched/ Mad Men again...it totally doesn't help that Roger's hair makes me all "Oh. Larry Tate." despite the fact that I find him far more attractive.
Bewitched can easily be read as the tensions of being gay and passing as straight in a repressive American culture.
And also as a commentary of the changing of the power-holder in a given household as women were becoming less and less satisfied with the choices being given to them.
was it consciously making those statements or are those put on it in hindsight?
So what can you read I Dream of Jeannie as? Or I Love Lucy?
I like Aims's take, but I think it was mostly something you could interpret after the fact. No way to be sure, but I doubt they were going for anything more than cute and funny.
I have, in all seriousness, read essays about both of them as proto-feminist(ish) statements...This woman named Susan Douglas wrote this whole book called(iirc) "Where the Boys Are" that's just full of stuff like that. I'm not sure I always agree, but she's passionate and has a fun style.
In the tv series Bewitched, I was always fascinated by the witches' culture, how Samantha would occasionally get disgusted with the normal world, transform herself into that black dress, and go hang out with Endora in that smoky, misty area. I was a clueless, mentally amorphous lump back then, and I'd like to see those bits again--but without the suburban-hell sections. I need a Good Parts Version.
A lot of it was probably unconscious--but it did have a character who had a special quality but was going to be shunned by society for showing it and that tension is what drove the comedy. It's not just what the intent of the makers was, but the underlying reasons why THIS show out of all the shows on the networks that year, became a huge hit? What did people respond to? The writing is mediocre to good (clearly not up to the standards of say, I Love Lucy, in terms of comedy) and the plots are very predictable, so what was it? Why do people still find it interesting?
Not to mention Paul Lynde was a regular.