f we don't fight against the folks who think the best way to be a consumer of media is to turn off your brain and just stare at the bright colors, we're gonna end up at "Ow! My Balls!" in no time.

So what about the folks who sometimes think the best way to consume media is to dial down the brain and enjoy the ride? 'Cause I enjoyed Die Hard and I don't feel that I've lost my credentials as an intelligent being by snickering at the obvious jokes and impossible stunts, then grinning at Hubby at the end and saying, "That was fun."

Indeed, a rug of value; an estimable rug, an honour’d rug; O unhappy rug, that should live to cover such days!

That reminds me...Corwood, bunk, are y'all ever bringing "The Hat" back? Because that's one place where I felt okay about mindfucking stuff. Because I do get that not everyone digs that. Even I don't *always* want to.

or mayhap El Knaverino, in the manner of the Spaniard, if brevity be not in thy soul nor wit.

Brilliant.

Well, first, Die Hard is a GREAT movie.

I think that saying that analyzing is part of enjoying art does not mean that it HAS to be done. I can look at a great painting and just enjoy it as something deeply pleasing to the eye and, if I choose, I can also analyze the use of color and line and think about where the painting fits in Art History.

I can do either or both. I think Moff's law and cornflake-pissing come in where one person insists the other HAS to approach the art the way they do.

And, again, Scrappy is wise.

Scrappy if you keep making reasonable statements we'll never have any flamewars.

Moff's Law is important, IMHO, in cases where ignoring the problem goes hand-in-hand with ignoring something that is actively problematic outside of the world of the film. Handwaving some applied phlebotinum generally doesn't hurt anyone. Handwaving the fact that a movie gives another example of Mighty Whitey and reinforces some truly skeevy imperialistic and/or racist thinking does hurt people. It may also implies that maybe some people are handwaving or flat-out refusing to examine some truly problematic thinking in real life as well.

Agreed.

Whee! The Brattle has a new print of Small Change this coming weekend/week. I haven't seen that since I was in High School.

Scrappy is indeed wise.

And I do think that, just as it's cornflake-pissy to pick apart someone's mindless fun, it's equally cornflake-pissy to walk into a thread where people are happily chattering away and insist that they stop (one blogger I found while Googling "Moff's law" proposed that anyone who takes the time to register on someone else's blog just in order to post "Some people have too much time on their hands" be summarily punched in the crotch by, like, the entire rest of the planet). Some people's cornflakes are thinkier cornflakes, that's all.

The ones that always boggle me are the people who post on Sociological Images complaining that everyone needs to stop taking it all so seriously and just enjoy it. Seriously? I mean, not that that site in particular doesn't occasionally crawl up its own ass, but that should really come as a surprise to exactly nobody, ever. These are sociology professors talking about their undergrad coursework! They do this for a living! Their day jobs are the entire reason for the website's existence! What the fuck did these yahoos think they were going to find here?