I think it's all subjective, but then, I'm an anthropologist.
What she said.
A place to talk about movies--old and new, good and bad, high art and high cheese. It's the place to place your kittens on the award winners, gossip about upcoming fims and discuss DVD releases and extras. Spoiler policy: White font all plot-related discussion until a movie's been in wide release two weeks, and keep the major HSQ in white font until two weeks after the video/DVD release.
I think it's all subjective, but then, I'm an anthropologist.
What she said.
-bumps dirt-covered fists with Jars-
I wish I was dirt covered. Stupid lab.
flea & Jars -
does "Bones" offend you?
I don't really watch it, but there was one episode where they were talking about pollen, and they had a fungus spore on the screen. A fungus! Also, shows like that always talk about carbon dating in stupid, stupid ways. Although I don't know if Bones has been guilty of that.
It's mostly about human remains too, which is very much not my specialty.
Okay, I just asked the osteo who sits next to me, and she started ranting. She DOES NOT like it. Something about picking up a skull and the madible not falling off.
In this conversation, I am Sue. Probably because we both come from theatre, which I think is a lot harder to define as an art than the visual or writing arts. If we are going with David's defininition of Art, I think most of what is on Broadway probably wouldn't qualify, but I think those people acting and directing an designing are still artists.
Of course, I once wrote a paper on how Stage Management was an art, and not a craft (or tech), because (among other things) when you were calling the show, if you were good, it wasn't necessarily about the cues you wrote in the book on the specific line, but about that particular performance, in that moment, and how it was differently paced every time.
When I was working full-time in theatre, I listed my "occupation" as 'theatre artist" even though I was working on bad productions of Children's theatre that were probably only momentarily capital "A" art.
I've never seen Bones.
I have dug up bones, though!
Going back a bit...
I have absolutely no doubt that anti-depressants can negatively effect creativity.
I'm sure it can, but it can also have a positive effect. I'm Living Proof!
Since I've been on the anti-depressants my thought processes have been clearer and my energy has increased and there has been a corresponding increase in my creativity.
Most of my You'll All Pays were written while on the 'butrin Bullet Train and I'm writing more even today. Before the anti-depressants I was too busy trying to stay awake as my brain was mired in doldrums and was desperately diving for Dreamland in an effort to avoid the stupid horribleness of Every Day Life.
So, while I no longer experience (for the most part) the extremes of emotion that can drive creative output, I'm feeling much more creative now that I'm not enslaved to those same extremes.
This Post Is Entirely Subjective. Your 'Butrin (or Whatever) May Vary.
This Post Is Not Art.
...or is it?
(DUN dun dun...)
Thank you, Strega. I was not up to the challenge of finding that data myself.
:: sits almost patiently waiting for the rest of Scola ::
it can also have a positive effect. I'm Living Proof!
Absolutely--even in a scenario as simple as "Well, they're why I'm still alive to even be able to attempt art."