And, of course, he's right.
Unless it's taking place under the current administration which has never lacked for ham-fisted and clumsy phraseology (though I'm pretty sure it was just ineptness on the part of the filmmakers and not a political point, sadly - I hope it was JJ and not Drew's fault).
Where was the source of the new Bond title? That may have the title of Indy 4 beat for silliness (and even, doG help us, Send in theAttack of the Clones).
SMG talks about "Possession" the movie she's in that co-stars Lee Pace.
What is
with
SMG co-starring opposite tall, noodly-looking people? Did the Enormous Hall Monitor teach them nothing?? Can't she be in a movie with Kiefer Sutherland, or one of the hobbits?
SMG talks about "Possession" the movie she's in that co-stars Lee Pace.
Accck! Fandoms colliding! But yeah, the height difference is gonna be hilarious. The plot sounds hella goofy though.
on the weekend, I saw a preview for
Miss Pettigrew Lives for a Day
[link]
I was all France McDormand! Ciaran Hinds! Shirley Henderson! Then Lee Pace came on screen and I think I broke something. I hope this is good.
Trailer here:
[link]
More on the Bond thing:
Several reporters at the press launch questioned whether the film makers should have opted for a snappier title. A blogger for the Guardian newspaper was already asking whether it was the "worst Bond title ever?"
Craig defended the name. "At the end of the last movie his heart's been broken and he doesn't have that quantum of solace, he doesn't have that ... closure on what happened in his life and he needs to find out," he told Reuters in an interview.
Of course! He doesn't have that quantum of solace!
He doesn't have that quantum of solace!
He should talk to Supes. I hear he has one.