Don't belong. Dangerous, like you. Can't be controlled. Can't be trusted. Everyone could just go on without me and not have to worry. People could be what they wanted to be. Could be with the people they wanted. Live simple. No secrets.

River ,'Objects In Space'


Buffistas Building a Better Board  

Do you have problems, concerns or recommendations about the technical side of the Phoenix? Air them here. Compliments also welcome.

To-do list


DCJensen - Oct 25, 2004 3:16:37 pm PDT #8479 of 10000
All is well that ends in pizza.

Too bad there's no way to set a variable in a user's profile whether to see whitefont as white or non-white.

Thread specific, doubly so.

---

Hey, my inquiry as to the rolling of post overflow into a new post turned out to be feasable, I thought I would muse anew...


Jon B. - Oct 25, 2004 4:33:14 pm PDT #8480 of 10000
A turkey in every toilet -- only in America!

Too bad there's no way to set a variable in a user's profile whether to see whitefont as white or non-white.

It's definitely possible. We talked at one time of having user-specific stylesheets and the whitefont is, or could easily be made, a style.

Is it a style? I can't remember. Let's check:

Am I a style?

t edit Nope. It's just a font color="ffffff" substitution, but that's not a barrier.


Gus - Oct 25, 2004 4:43:32 pm PDT #8481 of 10000
Bag the crypto. Say what is on your mind.

Yeah, Jon, that's a good play. I have that part of the code open now. I could replace the font part of the 's' quickedit with a div enclosure, if we think that is way to go.

The administration of user style sheets is a larger issue, of course, but the quickedit change would lay some foundation for that day.


§ ita § - Oct 25, 2004 4:43:52 pm PDT #8482 of 10000
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

It should be a style anyway, just so it's not tied in the HTML to the colour of the background.


Gus - Oct 25, 2004 4:56:39 pm PDT #8483 of 10000
Bag the crypto. Say what is on your mind.

Should be a style anyway, just so it's not tied in the HTML to the colour of the background.

I'm thinking in these terms:

. spoiler { font-family: "MS Sans Serif"; color: transparent; }

Which will allow changes in background color, without losing the blinvisbility of the spoiler.


Jon B. - Oct 25, 2004 5:01:49 pm PDT #8484 of 10000
A turkey in every toilet -- only in America!

There should already be something in the stylesheet. It's a class called "white-plus-sign". Not the best name, but I think it'll work.


Gus - Oct 25, 2004 5:05:57 pm PDT #8485 of 10000
Bag the crypto. Say what is on your mind.

"white-plus-sign" is committed to white. The "transparent" color val works fine with backgrounds that are not white.


Jon B. - Oct 25, 2004 5:07:51 pm PDT #8486 of 10000
A turkey in every toilet -- only in America!

Sorry -- I meant that we could change the white-plus-sign to transparent and it would do what it's currently doing as well as the spoiler font stuff.

t edit In fact, if we're talking about letting people change the background color, then we have to change the white-plus-sign class to work with that.


Gus - Oct 25, 2004 5:13:00 pm PDT #8487 of 10000
Bag the crypto. Say what is on your mind.

I meant that we could change the white-plus-sign to transparent and it would do what it's currently doing as well as the spoiler font stuff.

Yup. Change white-plus-sign to transparent, substitute the font replacement in quickedit to an enclosing white-plus-sign div. Easy peasy.


Jon B. - Oct 25, 2004 5:24:54 pm PDT #8488 of 10000
A turkey in every toilet -- only in America!

Actually, IIRC, you'd want to use a SPAN tag, not a DIV. A DIV puts its contents in its own paragraph, at least in some browsers (I'm too lazy to check the spec). SPAN does not.