I've been moving them to new users when I see them. There haven't been very many, considering the VIPage.
Buffistas Building a Better Board
Do you have problems, concerns or recommendations about the technical side of the Phoenix? Air them here. Compliments also welcome.
Logging in via the Horde interface should move them -- but I haven't tested the rule.
w.nilly
Somebody was looking for something about "willy nilly", and not about me, right? t /just a bit paranoid, and can't help having the way her name is spelled in English be a part of an existing expression (predating even the Buffista Dictionary)
[Edit: that's the longest t / I've ever had before]
Somebody was looking for something about "willy nilly", and not about me, right?
Willamina Nilly? So that's your real name! The secret is out!
Willamina Nilly?
Does that make me a character in the William/Liam/Billy/etc Jossverse? t /natter
They're there -- in the new users folder.
What "new users" folder? All I see is "inbox", "sent", "trash", and "handled".
I'm not using the web interface. I'm using the Mozilla e-mail client, but it always worked fine with HR.
Logging in via the Horde interface
What's the URL again?
insent, DX.
Got it, Jon. Thanks.
Okay, got Composer straightened out. It apparently wanted me to subscribe to the unseen folders, which I never needed to do with the old site. Weird.
We now have 987 registered users.
I was wondering about searching. I know our old search function was too database intensive (or something - no need to confuse me with facts I can't remember for more than 5 minutes).
Anyhow, I was wondering if an additional "qualifier" (not sure that's the right word, so bear with me) could be added onto the threadsuck function as a search work around. In other words, the threadsuck form could be modified, to add a field that tells it whose posts I want sucked. For example, I might threadsuck the Buffy thread, but only for posts made by Plei, or threadsuck Natter, but only for posts made by Nilly.
Would that be possible? Would it be too database (or Buffista!Techie) intensive?