By the way, ita, [link] works for me now. Go figure.
Don't belong. Dangerous, like you. Can't be controlled. Can't be trusted. Everyone could just go on without me and not have to worry. People could be what they wanted to be. Could be with the people they wanted. Live simple. No secrets.
River ,'Objects In Space'
Buffistas Building a Better Board
Do you have problems, concerns or recommendations about the technical side of the Phoenix? Air them here. Compliments also welcome.
Jon B. - Dec 28, 2002 11:11:33 pm PST #2420 of 10000
A turkey in every toilet -- only in America!
Michele T. - Dec 28, 2002 11:17:16 pm PST #2421 of 10000
with a gleam in my eye, and an almost airtight alibi
And looking at the thread title block, it could be
Natter 5,435: Will You People Never Shut Up?
Once more into the natter breach, dear friends. Blah blah nattercakes spoilerfree blah (Subscribe)
§ ita § - Dec 28, 2002 11:18:29 pm PST #2422 of 10000
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
It's currently commented out, but there's a line between the title and the blurb where the subscribe would go. I like it there better, since it's a more constant position, unlike after the highly variable length blurb.
Jon B. - Dec 28, 2002 11:20:08 pm PST #2423 of 10000
A turkey in every toilet -- only in America!
I agree with ita. That's also where it was in the original design.
§ ita § - Dec 28, 2002 11:22:59 pm PST #2424 of 10000
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Aha. I didn't know those were still around. Yup, that's where it's commented out. Although there are no outstanding plans for a discussion summary. A link to threadsuck might go there, though.
Michele T. - Dec 28, 2002 11:25:23 pm PST #2425 of 10000
with a gleam in my eye, and an almost airtight alibi
We did this already? I knew I thought it was a good idea...
Jon B. - Dec 28, 2002 11:30:05 pm PST #2426 of 10000
A turkey in every toilet -- only in America!
A link to threadsuck might go there, though.
Exactly what I was thinking. My question is this: Do we put in a "Threadsuck all", a "Threadsuck new" or both? I think there would be room for all three links.
Rob - Dec 28, 2002 11:38:03 pm PST #2427 of 10000
Also, let's think of a better word then "Threadsuck". "Download", perhaps? "Archive"? "Save"?
Jon B. - Dec 28, 2002 11:39:28 pm PST #2428 of 10000
A turkey in every toilet -- only in America!
I like "Threadsuck", but I can see that we might not want the string "suck" to be on a page for filtering reasons. Download would work for me.
§ ita § - Dec 28, 2002 11:40:43 pm PST #2429 of 10000
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
I think if suck breaks a filter, we've broken the filter. There're worse words in just about every page.
Still, not attached to the term at all.