I only asked because I'd never heard of that particular progression from Beta to 1.0 to 2.0. I thought maybe you knew something I didn't. ;)

Seriously, the difference between "Search thread #__" and "Search [thread names dropbox]" is very small. I would be against including the former at all. Thread number is very user un-friendly.

Bingo! I just got CVS working.

Oy, they're lucky they're the only game in town.

Or maybe I should have read the docs first.

Anyhoo. I have to do a little more experimentation, and then we may be good to go.

Jon, I copied the current site code onto the test -- if you didn't grab the code beforehand, I have it.

Now, we have issues here. There's a repository, where the test code is controlled. This is good and necessary. But we need a testing methodology too.

Jon -- you up on CVS?

Who else do we have as volunteer coders?

I know nothing about CVS, except that's where I buy shaving cream and razor blades.

You might want to start reading. [link] is kinda overwhelming. One will need a client to access the server (http://wincvs.org), and here's a howto for the WinCVS client. Karl can give you login info.

I've already imported the files, and now I'm just trying to work through some more details.

t volunteers

I can test drive CVS for you, too, if you want. I'm all about CVS.

Should I be reading "the Cederqvist," then?

wincvs.org isn't resolving for me.

Huh. Try [link]

Nope. Not working either. I'll try again later. Maybe a problem with my nameserver.

I just tried to do a search for the term V!Giles and got hits for every reference to Giles. Should I put quotes around it or can I not search for the "!"?

I imagine that's because the indexing function splits posts up into "words", and one of the keys for the end of a word would normally be an exclamation or question mark.

I'm saying "words", not to do the "I" "am" "not" "ironic" thing, but because I found out very early when playing search engines that What Your Programming Language Thinks Is A Word May Vary, and indeed may vary between languages. Unfortunately we have invented our own ideolect where "Vamp!Giles" is a word, but MySQL doesn't think so.

Which reminds me, ita was talking about the obscure algorithm which determines which document comes to the top in a search.

I imagine it's actually something like the classic:

W(T,D)=tf(T,D)*log(DN/df(T))

where tf(T, D) is the term frequency of T in D. DN is the total number of documents df(T) is the sum of frequencies of T in every document considered or as it called the document frequency of T.

which translates to "the score for the term in the document, multiplied by it's uniqueness" -- it's not just that the term appears, but that it doesn't appear frequently anywhere else, that makes it score highly.

Oh, and Jon -- what's the story with CSS and your sucked-thread design?

I didn't look at the source before to see how the style sheet was handled.