Now, I can hold a note for a long time...actually I can hold a note forever. But eventually that's just noise. It's the change we're listening for. The note coming after, and the one after that. That's what makes it music.

Host ,'Why We Fight'


Buffistas Building a Better Board  

Do you have problems, concerns or recommendations about the technical side of the Phoenix? Air them here. Compliments also welcome.

To-do list


§ ita § - Dec 21, 2002 5:34:33 pm PST #2211 of 10000
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

There are a whole lot of requests that people have made that I've completely forgotten to keep track of. I tend to prioritise by a) coolness to code or b) easiness to code, and that's no good.


Michele T. - Dec 21, 2002 6:27:55 pm PST #2212 of 10000
with a gleam in my eye, and an almost airtight alibi

I'm comfortable having my last name used, actually -- I keep saying I'm going to reverse-engineer wireframes (information design schematics) from the GIFs I did and put them in my portfolio...


§ ita § - Dec 21, 2002 8:13:39 pm PST #2213 of 10000
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Speaking of requests -- there have been a couple requests to change the behaviour of the thread links on the RH column -- which take you only the last post of the thread in question.

I'd like to throw this up for some more feedback. I never want to read the last userpagelimit - 1 posts, and always scroll straight to the bottom every time I click on a link with no new posts. So, selfishly, I'm very happy that these don't make me have to do that.

I'd been assuming that since no one mentioned it until just a while ago, that it was accepted behaviour.

Is this true, or wishful thinking?


Elena - Dec 21, 2002 8:41:34 pm PST #2214 of 10000
Thanks for all the fish.

If I want to find a specific post in a thread with no new posts I'll scroll back. Or, if I was smart, I'd bookmark it in the first place. Usually when I click on a thread with no new posts it's because I want to post something. It's easier to have just the last post on the page.


Sue - Dec 21, 2002 9:44:35 pm PST #2215 of 10000
hip deep in pie

I'm in agreement with what Elena said. Also, when I'm at home on my slow dial-up, and trying to catch-up in Natter by having my posts-per-page limit set at 100, it is quite annoying to have to wait for a page of one hundred already read posts to load.


Jon B. - Dec 21, 2002 9:58:13 pm PST #2216 of 10000
A turkey in every toilet -- only in America!

I like having the context of the last bunch of posts, rather than just the last one.

Whatever is decided, I think it should be consistent between the main threads and the ones on the right side.


billytea - Dec 21, 2002 10:57:45 pm PST #2217 of 10000
You were a wrong baby who grew up wrong. The wrong kind of wrong. It's better you hear it from a friend.

I like having the context of the last bunch of posts, rather than just the last one.

I lean this way too, though it doesn't cause me much distress. Consistency is a worthwhile goal regardless.


Michele T. - Dec 21, 2002 11:50:31 pm PST #2218 of 10000
with a gleam in my eye, and an almost airtight alibi

Whatever is decided, I think it should be consistent between the main threads and the ones on the right side.

Absolutely.


Jon B. - Dec 22, 2002 12:15:27 am PST #2219 of 10000
A turkey in every toilet -- only in America!

I'm comfortable having my last name used, actually

Would you rather I put your last name back in? It'll take me less than a minute to change it back.


Michele T. - Dec 22, 2002 12:27:55 am PST #2220 of 10000
with a gleam in my eye, and an almost airtight alibi

Nah, don't bother.