I think the bulk of the problem starts with bosses who don't check their own voicemail, but maybe that's just me.
true, but I happen to know this guy, and he does. of course, he's new in this particular position, and I can believe that the guy before him wouldn't/couldn't check his voicemail.
Oh, yeah, that poster says, "By the way, there are some girls in this, too, but only because we have to have them."
that poster says, "By the way, there are some girls in this, too, but only because we have to have them."
It also says "Heath, baby, nice ass." and "Aw, shucks. Thanks. Yours isn't bad either."
I want to see it either way, but if I hear reviews that make it sound like Ang didn't totally ungay it, I'll be in the theatre for sure.
Well, at the very least, whoever did the posters seemed to have gotten the gist of the hot boy-on-boy action.
That poster was a nice ending to an otherwise lousy day (overcast, rainy, cite checking).
Is that movie ever coming out? This is the problem with following entertainment news -- I started thinking about that movie at least when they filmed it, if not when they cast it. It's been SO LONG.
It's like my friend who told me when she was 6 weeks pregnant. Now I'm like, "You STILL haven't had it?!?!"
the posters seemed to have gotten the gist of the hot boy-on-boy action
I'm pretty easy -- I'll be happy with soulful yearning. My sister, though, will demand more.
From Yahoo movies:
Release Date: December 9th, 2005 (NY/LA/SF); December 16th, 2005 (expands to selects cities); January, 2006 (expands wide)
Just in time for my birthday! Yay!
Why couldn't you be a few months older, Suela?
WHY?????????