Also "Carter" but no "Clinton".
And, Agnew!
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
Also "Carter" but no "Clinton".
And, Agnew!
I never felt the slash in I Spy.
Did anyone else see the TV movie reunion show? That was slashy. Cosby's character's wife says, at the end I think, "So, do you miss that sort of thing?" "No, no, god, no." Her attention goes somewhere else, and he adds, "Him I missed."
that is presumed to be dictacted directly from God (by the Bible coders, not everybody).
Interesting.
I Spy had enough on it's plate by being the first interracial buddy show. I'm not sure America was ready yet for it's first interacial gay sex show.
Though their cover as tennis pro and trainer did mean lots of locker rooms.
I'm not sure America was ready yet for it's first interracial gay sex show.
Luckily Michael Mann was ready when American was.
Speaking of Gay Sex, The poster for Brokeback Mountain is surprisingly appealling.
America is ready for a nap.
Kat, can you take the quotes out of the link so we can see the pretty?
but to say that Shakespeare was one gets into what he may really have been feeling/meant.
Well, I used an example of something that either is or is not true, but is still a theory that people are persuaded by to differing degrees. I didn't want to complicate things by using an example of something that is not falsifiable, like "is Hamlet Catholic?"
eta: I didn't really finish my thought before posting. Anyway, whatever example I use is irrelevant, I just want to get to the idea of a theory with evidence that a student should be discouraged from propounding. Even if the evidence may support a similar theory that the student would not be discouraged from analyzing.
Kat, you have some schmutz in your link. However, my sister REALLY needs to see that.
bon, I agree with your example. I wouldn't allow that in my class either. However, a persuasive Catholic Hamlet is fair game.